A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
GRS bridge abutments—an effective means to alleviate bridge approach settlement
AbstractField tests of segmental block-faced geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments and piers have demonstrated excellent performance characteristics and very high load carrying capacity. One important feature of GRS abutment is that it can potentially eliminate the use of piling when situated over a weak foundation. This will not only reduce the costs but also reduce “bridge bumps” often experienced at the ends of a bridge resting on a pile-supported abutment. This study was undertaken to investigate the potential of GRS bridge abutments to alleviate bridge approach settlements. The study was conducted by the finite element method of analysis using the computer program DACSAR. The program was first calibrated by comparing its results with the measured data of the Founders/Meadows bridge abutment recently constructed by the Colorado Department of Transportation. A parametric study was then conducted to examine the effects of different foundation soils, ranging from loose sand to stiff clay, on the performance of a GRS abutment. Special attention was placed on the maximum vertical and horizontal movements of the abutment as well as the approach settlement characteristics. The study indicated that the finite element computer code DACSAR is a reliable analytical tool for analyzing the performance of GRS bridge abutments and that the GRS abutment is an effective means to reduce differential settlements between the abutment and the approach embankment.
GRS bridge abutments—an effective means to alleviate bridge approach settlement
AbstractField tests of segmental block-faced geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments and piers have demonstrated excellent performance characteristics and very high load carrying capacity. One important feature of GRS abutment is that it can potentially eliminate the use of piling when situated over a weak foundation. This will not only reduce the costs but also reduce “bridge bumps” often experienced at the ends of a bridge resting on a pile-supported abutment. This study was undertaken to investigate the potential of GRS bridge abutments to alleviate bridge approach settlements. The study was conducted by the finite element method of analysis using the computer program DACSAR. The program was first calibrated by comparing its results with the measured data of the Founders/Meadows bridge abutment recently constructed by the Colorado Department of Transportation. A parametric study was then conducted to examine the effects of different foundation soils, ranging from loose sand to stiff clay, on the performance of a GRS abutment. Special attention was placed on the maximum vertical and horizontal movements of the abutment as well as the approach settlement characteristics. The study indicated that the finite element computer code DACSAR is a reliable analytical tool for analyzing the performance of GRS bridge abutments and that the GRS abutment is an effective means to reduce differential settlements between the abutment and the approach embankment.
GRS bridge abutments—an effective means to alleviate bridge approach settlement
Helwany, Sam M.B. (author) / Wu, Jonathan T.H. (author) / Froessl, Burkhard (author)
Geotextiles and Geomembranes ; 21 ; 177-196
2003-01-03
20 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
GRS bridge abutments - an effective means to alleviate bridge approach settlement
Tema Archive | 2003
|GRS bridge abutments-an effective means to alleviate bridge approach settlement
Online Contents | 2003
|Settlement behind bridge abutments
Engineering Index Backfile | 1967
|Analysis of soil settlement behind bridge abutments
Elsevier | 2022
|Settlement of railway track near bridge abutments
British Library Online Contents | 1997
|