A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Which road do I take? A learning-based model of route-choice behavior with real-time information
AbstractThis paper presents a learning-based model of route-choice behavior when information is provided in real time. In a laboratory controlled experiment, participants made a long series of binary route-choice trials relying on real-time information and learning from their personal experience reinforced through feedback. A discrete choice model with a Mixed Logit specification, accounting for panel effects, was estimated based on the experiment’s data. It was found that information and experience have a combined effect on drivers’ route-choice behavior. Informed participants had faster learning rates and tended to base their decisions on memorization relating to previous outcomes whereas non-informed participants were slower in learning, required more exploration and tended to rely mostly on recent outcomes. Informed participants were more prone to risk-seeking and had greater sensitivity to travel time variability. In comparison, non-informed participants appeared to be more risk-averse and less sensitive to variability. These results have important policy implications on the design and implementation of ATIS initiatives. The advantage of incorporating insights from Prospect Theory and reinforced learning to improve the realism of travel behavior models is also discussed.
Which road do I take? A learning-based model of route-choice behavior with real-time information
AbstractThis paper presents a learning-based model of route-choice behavior when information is provided in real time. In a laboratory controlled experiment, participants made a long series of binary route-choice trials relying on real-time information and learning from their personal experience reinforced through feedback. A discrete choice model with a Mixed Logit specification, accounting for panel effects, was estimated based on the experiment’s data. It was found that information and experience have a combined effect on drivers’ route-choice behavior. Informed participants had faster learning rates and tended to base their decisions on memorization relating to previous outcomes whereas non-informed participants were slower in learning, required more exploration and tended to rely mostly on recent outcomes. Informed participants were more prone to risk-seeking and had greater sensitivity to travel time variability. In comparison, non-informed participants appeared to be more risk-averse and less sensitive to variability. These results have important policy implications on the design and implementation of ATIS initiatives. The advantage of incorporating insights from Prospect Theory and reinforced learning to improve the realism of travel behavior models is also discussed.
Which road do I take? A learning-based model of route-choice behavior with real-time information
Ben-Elia, Eran (author) / Shiftan, Yoram (author)
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice ; 44 ; 249-264
2010-01-16
16 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Which road do I take? A learning-based model of route-choice behavior with real-time information
Online Contents | 2010
|Modeling Inertia and Compliance Mechanisms in Route Choice Behavior Under Real-Time Information
British Library Online Contents | 2000
|British Library Online Contents | 2013
|Modeling Route Choice Behavior of Chinese Toll Road Users Based on Structural Equation Model
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011
|Route Choice Model with Inductive Learning
British Library Online Contents | 2000
|