A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
How correlated colour temperature manipulates human thermal perception and comfort
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4362-0798
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-8825
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3811-5634
Abstract With advanced heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and colour tunable LED lighting systems, indoor environmental parameters can be precisely controlled. In most colour-tunable lighting systems, the colour of light can be easily changed without increasing energy consumption. Anecdotal evidence suggests that people are under the impression that reddish light creates the perception of a warmer environment than bluish light. Although several studies have been conducted, their findings have been inconsistent. Inside an office-like laboratory climate chamber at the University of Sydney, 45 subjects were immersed in nine thermal/lighting conditions - combinations of three different room temperatures (21 ± 0.3 °C, 24 ± 0.3 °C and 26 ± 0.3 °C) and three correlated colour temperatures (CCT – 2762 K, 3968 K and 6253 K). Using questionnaires, thermal sensation, thermal comfort, thermal satisfaction, and satisfaction with the lighting were evaluated both initially and after thermal and lighting adaptation. The results show that, in a warmer environment (26 °C), CCT impacts subjects’ thermal sensation. Subjects judged the environment to be significantly cooler under 6253 K than 3968 K light (Z = −3.371, p = 0.001 for initial responses; Z = −3.173, p = 0.002 for adapted responses). Furthermore, high CCT light led to considerably improved thermal comfort at 24 °C and 26 °C. In a warmer environment (26 °C), 3968 K light positively impacted thermal comfort only after adaptation (Z = −2.883, p = 0.004 for 4000 K). The results also show that 2762 K light led to reduced satisfaction with the lighting for all temperature conditions.
Highlights 45 subjects were immersed in nine thermal/lighting conditions to investigate the hue heat hypothesis. Scenarios included three different room temperatures and three correlated colour temperatures. Subjects' thermal sensation is impacted by CCT only for warmer environments. High CCT light led to considerably improved thermal comfort at 24 °C and 26 °C. 2762 K light led to reduced satisfaction with the lighting regardless of different temperature conditions.
How correlated colour temperature manipulates human thermal perception and comfort
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4362-0798
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-8825
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3811-5634
Abstract With advanced heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and colour tunable LED lighting systems, indoor environmental parameters can be precisely controlled. In most colour-tunable lighting systems, the colour of light can be easily changed without increasing energy consumption. Anecdotal evidence suggests that people are under the impression that reddish light creates the perception of a warmer environment than bluish light. Although several studies have been conducted, their findings have been inconsistent. Inside an office-like laboratory climate chamber at the University of Sydney, 45 subjects were immersed in nine thermal/lighting conditions - combinations of three different room temperatures (21 ± 0.3 °C, 24 ± 0.3 °C and 26 ± 0.3 °C) and three correlated colour temperatures (CCT – 2762 K, 3968 K and 6253 K). Using questionnaires, thermal sensation, thermal comfort, thermal satisfaction, and satisfaction with the lighting were evaluated both initially and after thermal and lighting adaptation. The results show that, in a warmer environment (26 °C), CCT impacts subjects’ thermal sensation. Subjects judged the environment to be significantly cooler under 6253 K than 3968 K light (Z = −3.371, p = 0.001 for initial responses; Z = −3.173, p = 0.002 for adapted responses). Furthermore, high CCT light led to considerably improved thermal comfort at 24 °C and 26 °C. In a warmer environment (26 °C), 3968 K light positively impacted thermal comfort only after adaptation (Z = −2.883, p = 0.004 for 4000 K). The results also show that 2762 K light led to reduced satisfaction with the lighting for all temperature conditions.
Highlights 45 subjects were immersed in nine thermal/lighting conditions to investigate the hue heat hypothesis. Scenarios included three different room temperatures and three correlated colour temperatures. Subjects' thermal sensation is impacted by CCT only for warmer environments. High CCT light led to considerably improved thermal comfort at 24 °C and 26 °C. 2762 K light led to reduced satisfaction with the lighting regardless of different temperature conditions.
How correlated colour temperature manipulates human thermal perception and comfort
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4362-0798
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-8825
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3811-5634
Abstract With advanced heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and colour tunable LED lighting systems, indoor environmental parameters can be precisely controlled. In most colour-tunable lighting systems, the colour of light can be easily changed without increasing energy consumption. Anecdotal evidence suggests that people are under the impression that reddish light creates the perception of a warmer environment than bluish light. Although several studies have been conducted, their findings have been inconsistent. Inside an office-like laboratory climate chamber at the University of Sydney, 45 subjects were immersed in nine thermal/lighting conditions - combinations of three different room temperatures (21 ± 0.3 °C, 24 ± 0.3 °C and 26 ± 0.3 °C) and three correlated colour temperatures (CCT – 2762 K, 3968 K and 6253 K). Using questionnaires, thermal sensation, thermal comfort, thermal satisfaction, and satisfaction with the lighting were evaluated both initially and after thermal and lighting adaptation. The results show that, in a warmer environment (26 °C), CCT impacts subjects’ thermal sensation. Subjects judged the environment to be significantly cooler under 6253 K than 3968 K light (Z = −3.371, p = 0.001 for initial responses; Z = −3.173, p = 0.002 for adapted responses). Furthermore, high CCT light led to considerably improved thermal comfort at 24 °C and 26 °C. In a warmer environment (26 °C), 3968 K light positively impacted thermal comfort only after adaptation (Z = −2.883, p = 0.004 for 4000 K). The results also show that 2762 K light led to reduced satisfaction with the lighting for all temperature conditions.
Highlights 45 subjects were immersed in nine thermal/lighting conditions to investigate the hue heat hypothesis. Scenarios included three different room temperatures and three correlated colour temperatures. Subjects' thermal sensation is impacted by CCT only for warmer environments. High CCT light led to considerably improved thermal comfort at 24 °C and 26 °C. 2762 K light led to reduced satisfaction with the lighting regardless of different temperature conditions.
How correlated colour temperature manipulates human thermal perception and comfort
Brambilla, Arianna (author) / Hu, Wenye (author) / Samangouei, Reza (author) / Cadorin, Rebecca (author) / Davis, Wendy (author)
Building and Environment ; 177
2020-04-27
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Brightness perception of white LED lights with different correlated colour temperatures
| SAGE Publications | 2015
Brightness perception of white LED lights with different correlated colour temperatures
| Online Contents | 2015