A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Clarifying and re-conceptualising density
Highlights ► Density is an important concept within planning, although confusion abounds about definitions, policies and relationships to other issues. ► A taxonomy of density brings some clarity to the complexity, illustrating what types of density have been explored in research and where the gaps lie. ► Density should be re-conceptualised to include both ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ elements so that policymakers and practitioners consider the concept in a broader manner.
Abstract As a spatial concept, density is a useful tool in predicting and controlling land use. However, policymakers, practitioners, academics and citizens are often uncertain about how density, and especially higher densities, can be best utilised to create and nurture the design of urban environments. Barriers related to definitions, calculations, concepts and correlations with relevant issues prevent people from understanding density beyond a simple ratio of units to area. More needs to be done to show that density plays a key role in planning, architecture and urban design, and that discussions of density cannot be done in isolation of a whole host issues found in the built and natural environment. To that end, this paper aims to clarify some of the issues surrounding density, particularly about available definitions, calculating terms, the advantages and disadvantages of increasing densities in cities and uncovering relationships between density and issues pertinent to the design of urban environments. With these relationships in mind, a new way of visualising density is then offered—through a taxonomy of density—that categorises density into its component parts, allowing scholars, policymakers and practitioners to understand what aspects of density have been examined and what gaps are still present. Finally, a re-conceptualisation of density is presented, illustrating that density is more than a quantitative calculation that exists on its own; rather, for density to be considered as an integral part of the urban environment, both ‘hard’ (i.e., quantitative) and ‘soft’ (i.e., qualitative, contextual) elements must be included.
Clarifying and re-conceptualising density
Highlights ► Density is an important concept within planning, although confusion abounds about definitions, policies and relationships to other issues. ► A taxonomy of density brings some clarity to the complexity, illustrating what types of density have been explored in research and where the gaps lie. ► Density should be re-conceptualised to include both ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ elements so that policymakers and practitioners consider the concept in a broader manner.
Abstract As a spatial concept, density is a useful tool in predicting and controlling land use. However, policymakers, practitioners, academics and citizens are often uncertain about how density, and especially higher densities, can be best utilised to create and nurture the design of urban environments. Barriers related to definitions, calculations, concepts and correlations with relevant issues prevent people from understanding density beyond a simple ratio of units to area. More needs to be done to show that density plays a key role in planning, architecture and urban design, and that discussions of density cannot be done in isolation of a whole host issues found in the built and natural environment. To that end, this paper aims to clarify some of the issues surrounding density, particularly about available definitions, calculating terms, the advantages and disadvantages of increasing densities in cities and uncovering relationships between density and issues pertinent to the design of urban environments. With these relationships in mind, a new way of visualising density is then offered—through a taxonomy of density—that categorises density into its component parts, allowing scholars, policymakers and practitioners to understand what aspects of density have been examined and what gaps are still present. Finally, a re-conceptualisation of density is presented, illustrating that density is more than a quantitative calculation that exists on its own; rather, for density to be considered as an integral part of the urban environment, both ‘hard’ (i.e., quantitative) and ‘soft’ (i.e., qualitative, contextual) elements must be included.
Clarifying and re-conceptualising density
Boyko, Christopher T. (author) / Cooper, Rachel (author)
Progress in Planning ; 76 ; 1-61
2011-01-01
61 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Clarifying and re-conceptualising density
| Online Contents | 2011
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2022
Conceptualising Post-Industrial Rurality
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994