A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Unleashing or domesticating the vitality of citizens' initiatives? The paradoxical relationship between governments and citizens' initiatives in the energy transition
Abstract In their quest to create vital cities, West European city governments stimulate citizens to self-organize in citizens' initiatives. This trend it accompanied by conflicting scientific and governmental discourses: on the one hand, citizens' initiatives are praised for giving ‘power to the people’, on the other hand, citizens' initiatives are understood as mere ‘tools’ to roll-out government policies. By adopting a critical-constructive perspective, this study sets out to better understand the paradoxical attitudes of local governments toward the potential of CIs for stimulating urban vitality. We do so by uncovering patterns that explain the opening and closing of spaces for citizens to develop their initiatives. To this end, we conducted an in-depth case study into the relation between the local government and citizens initiatives in the energy transition in Rotterdam (the Netherlands). Our findings reveal that a configuration of different explanatory mechanisms leads to the ‘domestication’ of initiatives, which jeopardizes their unique transformative potential that can contribute to the vitality of cities.
Highlights A critical-constructive perspective is fruitful for studying urban vitality. Citizens’ initiatives have a unique transformative potential that can contribute to the vitality of cities. The city government ‘domesticates’ citizens’ initiatives to ensure they fit the municipal agenda. Project-oriented and performance-driven approaches close opportunities for citizens’ initiatives. Social learning infrastructures and awareness of mutual dependencies may open opportunities for citizens’ initiatives.
Unleashing or domesticating the vitality of citizens' initiatives? The paradoxical relationship between governments and citizens' initiatives in the energy transition
Abstract In their quest to create vital cities, West European city governments stimulate citizens to self-organize in citizens' initiatives. This trend it accompanied by conflicting scientific and governmental discourses: on the one hand, citizens' initiatives are praised for giving ‘power to the people’, on the other hand, citizens' initiatives are understood as mere ‘tools’ to roll-out government policies. By adopting a critical-constructive perspective, this study sets out to better understand the paradoxical attitudes of local governments toward the potential of CIs for stimulating urban vitality. We do so by uncovering patterns that explain the opening and closing of spaces for citizens to develop their initiatives. To this end, we conducted an in-depth case study into the relation between the local government and citizens initiatives in the energy transition in Rotterdam (the Netherlands). Our findings reveal that a configuration of different explanatory mechanisms leads to the ‘domestication’ of initiatives, which jeopardizes their unique transformative potential that can contribute to the vitality of cities.
Highlights A critical-constructive perspective is fruitful for studying urban vitality. Citizens’ initiatives have a unique transformative potential that can contribute to the vitality of cities. The city government ‘domesticates’ citizens’ initiatives to ensure they fit the municipal agenda. Project-oriented and performance-driven approaches close opportunities for citizens’ initiatives. Social learning infrastructures and awareness of mutual dependencies may open opportunities for citizens’ initiatives.
Unleashing or domesticating the vitality of citizens' initiatives? The paradoxical relationship between governments and citizens' initiatives in the energy transition
Visser, Vivian (author) / van Popering-Verkerk, Jitske (author) / Minkman, Ellen (author) / van Buuren, Arwin (author)
Cities ; 137
2023-03-11
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Urban agriculture initiatives: Understanding the role of citizens in sustainable development
BASE | 2022
|Tackling Challenges in the Engagement of Citizens with Smart City Initiatives
BASE | 2017
|Co-production Makes Cities Smarter: Citizens’ Participation in Smart City Initiatives
Springer Verlag | 2016
|