A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Tackling uncertainty in life cycle assessments for the built environment: A review
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-1262
Abstract The building and construction sectors contribute around 38% of global energy-related carbon emissions. LCA plays an important role in environmental assessments of products and buildings. In some countries, assessments are now being required as part of the planning submissions for building projects. And existing building environment certifications systems, such as BREEAM and LEED, require a form of carbon assessment. This has increased the demand for manufacturers to produce environmental product declarations (EPDs) to support assessments and design decisions at building scale, whilst also being used for product procurement. LCA results are often presented as deterministic values and uncertainty is often ignored. This is particularly dangerous in the case of comparative LCA where, for example, the intention can be to reduce carbon emissions by selecting a product or design alternative with a lower footprint. This paper reviews the approaches for dealing with uncertainties in LCA in general, and in the specific application of LCA to construction products and buildings. Buildings are complex and representing this in an LCA, which is a model of reality, can be challenging. The largest impact savings are achieved during the early stages of design where uncertainty and variability in design are high. Therefore, addressing and communicating uncertainty here is even more critical. Barriers, such as access to uncertainty information in EPDs and the lack of a consistent uncertainty procedure, are discussed. Recommendations for future improvements include reporting of uncertainty information and data quality assessments in EPDs, accessible digitised EPD information and integration of uncertainty analysis in building LCA software. As in previous reviews, both building carbon assessments and traditional LCA, suggest, there needs to be a great improvement in the transparency and reporting of assumptions and uncertainties. This applies to both products, in the form of EPDs, and building LCA results in academic literature and industry reports.
Highlights Review of treatment of uncertainty in LCA, both in general and for application to construction products and buildings. While uncertainty information is available in some LCI datasets, it is not available in published EPDs. In industry, EPDs are often used as the input for building LCA and hence uncertainty in products is not captured at building scale. Barriers to including uncertainty information in built environment LCAs are identified and recommendations are provided. Recommendations include the verification for building LCAs, inclusion of data quality assessments and better transparency.
Tackling uncertainty in life cycle assessments for the built environment: A review
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-1262
Abstract The building and construction sectors contribute around 38% of global energy-related carbon emissions. LCA plays an important role in environmental assessments of products and buildings. In some countries, assessments are now being required as part of the planning submissions for building projects. And existing building environment certifications systems, such as BREEAM and LEED, require a form of carbon assessment. This has increased the demand for manufacturers to produce environmental product declarations (EPDs) to support assessments and design decisions at building scale, whilst also being used for product procurement. LCA results are often presented as deterministic values and uncertainty is often ignored. This is particularly dangerous in the case of comparative LCA where, for example, the intention can be to reduce carbon emissions by selecting a product or design alternative with a lower footprint. This paper reviews the approaches for dealing with uncertainties in LCA in general, and in the specific application of LCA to construction products and buildings. Buildings are complex and representing this in an LCA, which is a model of reality, can be challenging. The largest impact savings are achieved during the early stages of design where uncertainty and variability in design are high. Therefore, addressing and communicating uncertainty here is even more critical. Barriers, such as access to uncertainty information in EPDs and the lack of a consistent uncertainty procedure, are discussed. Recommendations for future improvements include reporting of uncertainty information and data quality assessments in EPDs, accessible digitised EPD information and integration of uncertainty analysis in building LCA software. As in previous reviews, both building carbon assessments and traditional LCA, suggest, there needs to be a great improvement in the transparency and reporting of assumptions and uncertainties. This applies to both products, in the form of EPDs, and building LCA results in academic literature and industry reports.
Highlights Review of treatment of uncertainty in LCA, both in general and for application to construction products and buildings. While uncertainty information is available in some LCI datasets, it is not available in published EPDs. In industry, EPDs are often used as the input for building LCA and hence uncertainty in products is not captured at building scale. Barriers to including uncertainty information in built environment LCAs are identified and recommendations are provided. Recommendations include the verification for building LCAs, inclusion of data quality assessments and better transparency.
Tackling uncertainty in life cycle assessments for the built environment: A review
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-1262
Abstract The building and construction sectors contribute around 38% of global energy-related carbon emissions. LCA plays an important role in environmental assessments of products and buildings. In some countries, assessments are now being required as part of the planning submissions for building projects. And existing building environment certifications systems, such as BREEAM and LEED, require a form of carbon assessment. This has increased the demand for manufacturers to produce environmental product declarations (EPDs) to support assessments and design decisions at building scale, whilst also being used for product procurement. LCA results are often presented as deterministic values and uncertainty is often ignored. This is particularly dangerous in the case of comparative LCA where, for example, the intention can be to reduce carbon emissions by selecting a product or design alternative with a lower footprint. This paper reviews the approaches for dealing with uncertainties in LCA in general, and in the specific application of LCA to construction products and buildings. Buildings are complex and representing this in an LCA, which is a model of reality, can be challenging. The largest impact savings are achieved during the early stages of design where uncertainty and variability in design are high. Therefore, addressing and communicating uncertainty here is even more critical. Barriers, such as access to uncertainty information in EPDs and the lack of a consistent uncertainty procedure, are discussed. Recommendations for future improvements include reporting of uncertainty information and data quality assessments in EPDs, accessible digitised EPD information and integration of uncertainty analysis in building LCA software. As in previous reviews, both building carbon assessments and traditional LCA, suggest, there needs to be a great improvement in the transparency and reporting of assumptions and uncertainties. This applies to both products, in the form of EPDs, and building LCA results in academic literature and industry reports.
Highlights Review of treatment of uncertainty in LCA, both in general and for application to construction products and buildings. While uncertainty information is available in some LCI datasets, it is not available in published EPDs. In industry, EPDs are often used as the input for building LCA and hence uncertainty in products is not captured at building scale. Barriers to including uncertainty information in built environment LCAs are identified and recommendations are provided. Recommendations include the verification for building LCAs, inclusion of data quality assessments and better transparency.
Tackling uncertainty in life cycle assessments for the built environment: A review
Marsh, Ellen (author) / Allen, Stephen (author) / Hattam, Laura (author)
Building and Environment ; 231
2022-12-17
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Life Cycle Assessments of Circular Economy in the Built Environment—A Scoping Review
| BASE | 2022
Life Cycle Assessments of Circular Economy in the Built Environment—A Scoping Review
| DOAJ | 2022
Book Review: Life Cycle Assessment in the Built Environment
| British Library Online Contents | 2012
Life Cycle Assessment in the Built Environment
| Online Contents | 2012
Life Cycle Assessment in the Built Environment
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2012