A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Impact of ASHRAE’s museum climate classes on energy consumption and indoor climate fluctuations: Full-scale measurements in museum Hermitage Amsterdam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-8416
Graphical abstract Display Omitted
Highlights The energy consumption and the indoor climate were monitored for one year. A reference class (ultra-stable), ASHRAE’s class AA and A were tested repeatedly. Class AA saved 49%, Class A saved 63% of energy compared to the reference class. Classes AA and A show decreased hourly and increased daily fluctuations of T and RH. It appears that the overall collection degradation risk has not changed significantly.
Abstract In the 20th century, museum indoor climates have been conditioned ever more strictly, sometimes beyond guidelines, allowing no fluctuations at all. Among other effects, this has led to excessive energy demands. At the start of the 21st century, interest has increased to condition the indoor climate more reasonable. This study assessed the energy impact of three levels of museum climate control: Reference (21°C/50% RH, no permissible fluctuations), ASHRAE’s Class AA, ASHRAE’s Class A. Full-scale measurements were conducted in the museum Hermitage Amsterdam for one year. The results show that Class AA saved 49% and Class A saved 63% compared to the Reference setpoint strategy. Moreover, relaxing the climate specifications decreased hourly fluctuations, but increased daily fluctuations. It is highly likely that the overall degradation risk has not significantly changed for most artefacts.
Impact of ASHRAE’s museum climate classes on energy consumption and indoor climate fluctuations: Full-scale measurements in museum Hermitage Amsterdam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-8416
Graphical abstract Display Omitted
Highlights The energy consumption and the indoor climate were monitored for one year. A reference class (ultra-stable), ASHRAE’s class AA and A were tested repeatedly. Class AA saved 49%, Class A saved 63% of energy compared to the reference class. Classes AA and A show decreased hourly and increased daily fluctuations of T and RH. It appears that the overall collection degradation risk has not changed significantly.
Abstract In the 20th century, museum indoor climates have been conditioned ever more strictly, sometimes beyond guidelines, allowing no fluctuations at all. Among other effects, this has led to excessive energy demands. At the start of the 21st century, interest has increased to condition the indoor climate more reasonable. This study assessed the energy impact of three levels of museum climate control: Reference (21°C/50% RH, no permissible fluctuations), ASHRAE’s Class AA, ASHRAE’s Class A. Full-scale measurements were conducted in the museum Hermitage Amsterdam for one year. The results show that Class AA saved 49% and Class A saved 63% compared to the Reference setpoint strategy. Moreover, relaxing the climate specifications decreased hourly fluctuations, but increased daily fluctuations. It is highly likely that the overall degradation risk has not significantly changed for most artefacts.
Impact of ASHRAE’s museum climate classes on energy consumption and indoor climate fluctuations: Full-scale measurements in museum Hermitage Amsterdam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-8416
Graphical abstract Display Omitted
Highlights The energy consumption and the indoor climate were monitored for one year. A reference class (ultra-stable), ASHRAE’s class AA and A were tested repeatedly. Class AA saved 49%, Class A saved 63% of energy compared to the reference class. Classes AA and A show decreased hourly and increased daily fluctuations of T and RH. It appears that the overall collection degradation risk has not changed significantly.
Abstract In the 20th century, museum indoor climates have been conditioned ever more strictly, sometimes beyond guidelines, allowing no fluctuations at all. Among other effects, this has led to excessive energy demands. At the start of the 21st century, interest has increased to condition the indoor climate more reasonable. This study assessed the energy impact of three levels of museum climate control: Reference (21°C/50% RH, no permissible fluctuations), ASHRAE’s Class AA, ASHRAE’s Class A. Full-scale measurements were conducted in the museum Hermitage Amsterdam for one year. The results show that Class AA saved 49% and Class A saved 63% compared to the Reference setpoint strategy. Moreover, relaxing the climate specifications decreased hourly fluctuations, but increased daily fluctuations. It is highly likely that the overall degradation risk has not significantly changed for most artefacts.
Impact of ASHRAE’s museum climate classes on energy consumption and indoor climate fluctuations: Full-scale measurements in museum Hermitage Amsterdam
Kramer, R.P. (author) / Schellen, H.L. (author) / van Schijndel, A.W.M. (author)
Energy and Buildings ; 130 ; 286-294
2016-08-03
9 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
−Energy , Saving , Museum , Historical building , Ashrae
Feature: Museum - Guggenheim Hermitage Museum
| Online Contents | 2002
| Online Contents | 2008
Energy conservation - ASHRAE's opportunity
| Tema Archive | 1974
| Online Contents | 2006