A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Reinforcement corrosion in cement- and alternatively-stabilised rammed earth materials
Highlights Non-cementitious stabilisers do not protect mild steel from corrosion. Carbonated cement-stabilised materials are susceptible to corrosion. RE is less susceptible than concrete to chloride attack due to faster drying times. New half-cell potential limits are needed for RE. Galvanised, stainless steel or fibre reinforced polymer reinforcements should be used.
Abstract Developing low-embodied energy building materials can significantly contribute to reducing global greenhouse gas emissions. However, these new building materials must be properly understood before they can or will be adopted by the construction industry. In this paper, we examine the corrosion of reinforcement embedded within rammed earth materials in both atmospheric and accelerated carbonation conditions. Six rammed earth materials with alternative stabilisers to cement were studied – three stabilisers combined with a substrate of either crushed limestone or recycled brick and concrete – and contrasted against cement-stabilised crushed limestone. The stabilisers included industrial by-products fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag and silica fume, combined with sodium hydroxide or hydrated lime as activators, or with no activator, to form alkali-, lime- and self-activated rammed earth, respectively. Likelihood of reinforcement corrosion was assessed via changes in reinforcement half-cell potential and matrix carbonation. Half-cell potential results for four cement-stabilised rammed earth mixes that underwent accelerated carbonation showed that while uncarbonated cement-stabilised rammed earth protected steel from corrosion, once carbonated, the electrochemical behaviour was distinctly different and reinforcement was found to corrode. Self-activated rammed earth carbonated fully within 29 weeks. Carbonation rates of alkali- and lime-activated rammed earth were sufficiently slow that the carbonation front would not reach reinforcement with a typical cover depth of 150 mm over a typical 50 year design life. However, the carbonation front will likely breach a cover of 50 mm in that time. Electrochemical half-cell potential measurements of alkali-activated rammed earth were similar for both accelerated carbonation specimens and those only exposed to atmospheric conditions. Alternative rammed earth materials equilibrated to atmospheric moisture and CO2 levels gave half-cell potential readings above -200 mV SCE: a value previously shown to be indicative of a negligible corrosion rate in cement-stabilised RE. However, destructive testing revealed that reinforcement embedded in all specimens was corroded, i.e. this value is not indicative of negligible corrosion in these materials. Results therefore indicate that mild steel should not be used in RE materials not containing cement. Rather, galvanised, stainless steel or fibre reinforced polymer reinforcements should be used to avoid reduction in service life due to corrosion.
Reinforcement corrosion in cement- and alternatively-stabilised rammed earth materials
Highlights Non-cementitious stabilisers do not protect mild steel from corrosion. Carbonated cement-stabilised materials are susceptible to corrosion. RE is less susceptible than concrete to chloride attack due to faster drying times. New half-cell potential limits are needed for RE. Galvanised, stainless steel or fibre reinforced polymer reinforcements should be used.
Abstract Developing low-embodied energy building materials can significantly contribute to reducing global greenhouse gas emissions. However, these new building materials must be properly understood before they can or will be adopted by the construction industry. In this paper, we examine the corrosion of reinforcement embedded within rammed earth materials in both atmospheric and accelerated carbonation conditions. Six rammed earth materials with alternative stabilisers to cement were studied – three stabilisers combined with a substrate of either crushed limestone or recycled brick and concrete – and contrasted against cement-stabilised crushed limestone. The stabilisers included industrial by-products fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag and silica fume, combined with sodium hydroxide or hydrated lime as activators, or with no activator, to form alkali-, lime- and self-activated rammed earth, respectively. Likelihood of reinforcement corrosion was assessed via changes in reinforcement half-cell potential and matrix carbonation. Half-cell potential results for four cement-stabilised rammed earth mixes that underwent accelerated carbonation showed that while uncarbonated cement-stabilised rammed earth protected steel from corrosion, once carbonated, the electrochemical behaviour was distinctly different and reinforcement was found to corrode. Self-activated rammed earth carbonated fully within 29 weeks. Carbonation rates of alkali- and lime-activated rammed earth were sufficiently slow that the carbonation front would not reach reinforcement with a typical cover depth of 150 mm over a typical 50 year design life. However, the carbonation front will likely breach a cover of 50 mm in that time. Electrochemical half-cell potential measurements of alkali-activated rammed earth were similar for both accelerated carbonation specimens and those only exposed to atmospheric conditions. Alternative rammed earth materials equilibrated to atmospheric moisture and CO2 levels gave half-cell potential readings above -200 mV SCE: a value previously shown to be indicative of a negligible corrosion rate in cement-stabilised RE. However, destructive testing revealed that reinforcement embedded in all specimens was corroded, i.e. this value is not indicative of negligible corrosion in these materials. Results therefore indicate that mild steel should not be used in RE materials not containing cement. Rather, galvanised, stainless steel or fibre reinforced polymer reinforcements should be used to avoid reduction in service life due to corrosion.
Reinforcement corrosion in cement- and alternatively-stabilised rammed earth materials
Meek, Alexandra H. (author) / Beckett, Christopher T.S. (author) / Elchalakani, Mohamed (author)
2020-12-02
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Rammed earth , Accelerated carbonation , Depassivation , Geopolymer , Half-cell potential , Corrosion susceptibility , Sustainable building , Waste products , Alkali-activation , acc. carb , see ‘accelerated carbonation’ , accelerated carbonation , specimen subset exposed to accelerated carbonation , AD , specimen group – atmospheric, dry , atmos , see ‘atmospheric’ , atmospheric , specimen subset exposed to atmospheric conditions , AW , specimen group – atmospheric, wet , BC , recycled brick and concrete , BC.AA , alkali-activated recycled brick and concrete , BC.L , lime-activated recycled brick and concrete , BC.S , self-activated recycled brick and concrete , CBF , crushed brick fines , cement , ordinary Portland cement , CD , specimen group – accelerated carb, dry , CW , specimen group – accelerated carb, wet , dry , specimen subset protected from weather , NaOH , sodium hydroxide , DD , dry density , CL , crushed limestone , CL.AA , alkali-activated crushed limestone , CL.C , cement-stabilised crushed limestone , CL.L , lime-activated crushed limestone , CL.S , self-activated crushed limestone , FA , fly ash , GGBFS , ground granulated blast furnace slag , HCP , half-cell potential , lime , hydrated lime , RCA , recycled concrete aggregate , RE , rammed earth , SCE , saturated calomel electrode , SF , silica fume , SM1 , soil mix 1 , SM2 , soil mix 2 , wet , specimen subset exposed to various environments
Corrosion protection of steel embedded in cement-stabilised rammed earth
British Library Online Contents | 2018
|Embodied energy in cement stabilised rammed earth walls
Elsevier | 2009
|Stress–Strain Characteristics of Cement Stabilised Rammed Earth
Springer Verlag | 2022
|