A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Effect of anodizing treatment on the very high cycle fatigue behavior of 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy
Highlights S–N curve between 105 and 5×109 cycles for anodizing specimens were obtained. Cracks initiated from the anodizing film/substrate interface for CAA and SAA. CAA and SAA both led to an appreciable reduction in the fatigue strength. The fatigue limit of SAA with its defects was well predicted by EI Haddad model.
Abstract The effects of chromic acid anodizing (CAA) and sulfuric acid anodizing (SAA) treatments on the very high cycle fatigue behavior of 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy were investigated through ultrasonic fatigue tests. The results showed that CAA and SAA treatments resulted in an appreciable reduction in the fatigue strength and crack initiation from the interface between the anodizing film and substrate, whereas the fatigue crack of substrate specimens initiated from the specimen subsurface over 5×108 cycles. The decrease in fatigue strength of the CAA specimens was associated with the residual tensile stress arising from the elastic mismatch between the anodizing film and the substrate. The defects in SAA film, such as segmentation cracks and overgrowth of the anodizing film into the substrate, contributed to the reduction of fatigue strength and multi-crack initiations. The predicted fatigue limit for SAA specimens well agreed with the experimental results.
Effect of anodizing treatment on the very high cycle fatigue behavior of 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy
Highlights S–N curve between 105 and 5×109 cycles for anodizing specimens were obtained. Cracks initiated from the anodizing film/substrate interface for CAA and SAA. CAA and SAA both led to an appreciable reduction in the fatigue strength. The fatigue limit of SAA with its defects was well predicted by EI Haddad model.
Abstract The effects of chromic acid anodizing (CAA) and sulfuric acid anodizing (SAA) treatments on the very high cycle fatigue behavior of 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy were investigated through ultrasonic fatigue tests. The results showed that CAA and SAA treatments resulted in an appreciable reduction in the fatigue strength and crack initiation from the interface between the anodizing film and substrate, whereas the fatigue crack of substrate specimens initiated from the specimen subsurface over 5×108 cycles. The decrease in fatigue strength of the CAA specimens was associated with the residual tensile stress arising from the elastic mismatch between the anodizing film and the substrate. The defects in SAA film, such as segmentation cracks and overgrowth of the anodizing film into the substrate, contributed to the reduction of fatigue strength and multi-crack initiations. The predicted fatigue limit for SAA specimens well agreed with the experimental results.
Effect of anodizing treatment on the very high cycle fatigue behavior of 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy
Nie, Baohua (author) / Zhang, Zheng (author) / Zhao, Zihua (author) / Zhong, Qunpeng (author)
2013-03-25
6 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Effect of anodizing treatment on the very high cycle fatigue behavior of 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy
| British Library Online Contents | 2013
| British Library Online Contents | 2011
Influences of Solid Solution Treatment on Hard Anodizing Films on 2A12 Aluminum Alloys
| British Library Online Contents | 2016
Indentation creep-fatigue test on aluminum alloy 2A12
| British Library Online Contents | 2010
Effect of hammer peening on fatigue life of aluminum alloy 2A12-T4
| British Library Online Contents | 2009