A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Hyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials: Extension of existing models to include finite strains and their comparison
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8519-2886
Abstract The objective of this article is to present an extension of existing hyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials to include finite strains and to examine and compare the model responses. Several existing representative isotropic hyperelastic models with pressure-dependent bulk and shear moduli are reformulated to accommodate them to finite strains, as well as to tensile stress range. To be consistent with the multiplicative finite strain elastoplasticity, the stress versus the elastic strain relation, together with the fourth-order elastic tangent moduli tensor, in the description relative to the intermediate configuration is derived for each hyperelastic model. The spatial and material descriptions of the hyperelastic models are also derived. A systematic parametric study with a particular focus on the pressure-dependent property of the elastic tangent moduli is performed to examine and compare the model responses. The analysis reveals significant difference in the model responses depending on the types of models. Notably, some models exhibit unreasonable decrease in stress in the process of triaxial compression.
Highlights Hyperelastic models for geomaterials are formulated to include finite strain. Model formulation compatible with the multiplicative elastoplasticity is presented. Systematic parametric study is performed to examine and compare the model responses.
Hyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials: Extension of existing models to include finite strains and their comparison
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8519-2886
Abstract The objective of this article is to present an extension of existing hyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials to include finite strains and to examine and compare the model responses. Several existing representative isotropic hyperelastic models with pressure-dependent bulk and shear moduli are reformulated to accommodate them to finite strains, as well as to tensile stress range. To be consistent with the multiplicative finite strain elastoplasticity, the stress versus the elastic strain relation, together with the fourth-order elastic tangent moduli tensor, in the description relative to the intermediate configuration is derived for each hyperelastic model. The spatial and material descriptions of the hyperelastic models are also derived. A systematic parametric study with a particular focus on the pressure-dependent property of the elastic tangent moduli is performed to examine and compare the model responses. The analysis reveals significant difference in the model responses depending on the types of models. Notably, some models exhibit unreasonable decrease in stress in the process of triaxial compression.
Highlights Hyperelastic models for geomaterials are formulated to include finite strain. Model formulation compatible with the multiplicative elastoplasticity is presented. Systematic parametric study is performed to examine and compare the model responses.
Hyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials: Extension of existing models to include finite strains and their comparison
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8519-2886
Abstract The objective of this article is to present an extension of existing hyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials to include finite strains and to examine and compare the model responses. Several existing representative isotropic hyperelastic models with pressure-dependent bulk and shear moduli are reformulated to accommodate them to finite strains, as well as to tensile stress range. To be consistent with the multiplicative finite strain elastoplasticity, the stress versus the elastic strain relation, together with the fourth-order elastic tangent moduli tensor, in the description relative to the intermediate configuration is derived for each hyperelastic model. The spatial and material descriptions of the hyperelastic models are also derived. A systematic parametric study with a particular focus on the pressure-dependent property of the elastic tangent moduli is performed to examine and compare the model responses. The analysis reveals significant difference in the model responses depending on the types of models. Notably, some models exhibit unreasonable decrease in stress in the process of triaxial compression.
Highlights Hyperelastic models for geomaterials are formulated to include finite strain. Model formulation compatible with the multiplicative elastoplasticity is presented. Systematic parametric study is performed to examine and compare the model responses.
Hyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials: Extension of existing models to include finite strains and their comparison
Yamakawa, Yuki (author)
2021-12-07
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Numerical modelling of expansive geomaterials: Finite element formulation and constitutive models
| Elsevier | 2024
The SMP concept-based 3D constitutive models for geomaterials
| TIBKAT | 2006
Development of Constitutive Models for Poro-Hyperelastic Materials
| Springer Verlag | 2020
Constitutive Modelling of Geomaterials
| Online Contents | 2019
Constitutive Modeling of Geomaterials
| Online Contents | 2004