A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Review of analytical studies on seismic fluid-structure interaction of base-supported cylindrical tanks
Highlights Analytical studies on fluid-structure interaction of cylindrical tanks are reviewed. Analytical solutions for impulsive and convective responses of tanks are presented. Seismic responses are calculated and compared for a range of tank dimensions. Analytical results are normalized to be unitless, applicable to different tanks. Calculation errors involved in the reviewed studies are identified and corrected.
Abstract Analytical solutions for seismic fluid-structure interaction (FSI) of tanks are used by analysts and engineers for a number of purposes, including preliminary sizing, risk assessment, and verification of numerical models. Analytical solutions for seismic FSI of tanks were first developed in the 1930s and have been extended and/or modified in the following nine decades to accommodate different seismic inputs and boundary conditions. This paper reviews published analytical solutions for rigid and flexible, base-supported, cylindrical tanks subjected to unidirectional horizontal motion of a small amplitude. The studies parsed the fluid-structure (FSI) response into an impulsive and a convective component, and addressed frequencies of lateral motions of the tank (i.e., impulsive frequencies), hydrodynamic pressures, frequencies of waves (i.e., convective frequencies), wave heights, and reactions at the base. The solutions were categorized into exact and approximate solutions based on the methodologies used. Herein, FSI responses are calculated and compared for a range of tank dimensions using the analytical solutions from the different studies. The responses presented here are normalized to be unitless, and can be used for tanks with different dimensions and mechanical properties, and subjected to different input motions. A sample steel water tank is analyzed using the normalized solutions for two earthquake ground motions with different frequency contents. Ignoring tank flexibility may significantly underestimate seismic responses of the tank and its contained fluid. The approximate solutions, which have been widely used for decades, may not be sufficiently accurate in the modern era. Calculation errors in the reviewed studies are identified and corrected, and differences are quantified for the sample tank.
Review of analytical studies on seismic fluid-structure interaction of base-supported cylindrical tanks
Highlights Analytical studies on fluid-structure interaction of cylindrical tanks are reviewed. Analytical solutions for impulsive and convective responses of tanks are presented. Seismic responses are calculated and compared for a range of tank dimensions. Analytical results are normalized to be unitless, applicable to different tanks. Calculation errors involved in the reviewed studies are identified and corrected.
Abstract Analytical solutions for seismic fluid-structure interaction (FSI) of tanks are used by analysts and engineers for a number of purposes, including preliminary sizing, risk assessment, and verification of numerical models. Analytical solutions for seismic FSI of tanks were first developed in the 1930s and have been extended and/or modified in the following nine decades to accommodate different seismic inputs and boundary conditions. This paper reviews published analytical solutions for rigid and flexible, base-supported, cylindrical tanks subjected to unidirectional horizontal motion of a small amplitude. The studies parsed the fluid-structure (FSI) response into an impulsive and a convective component, and addressed frequencies of lateral motions of the tank (i.e., impulsive frequencies), hydrodynamic pressures, frequencies of waves (i.e., convective frequencies), wave heights, and reactions at the base. The solutions were categorized into exact and approximate solutions based on the methodologies used. Herein, FSI responses are calculated and compared for a range of tank dimensions using the analytical solutions from the different studies. The responses presented here are normalized to be unitless, and can be used for tanks with different dimensions and mechanical properties, and subjected to different input motions. A sample steel water tank is analyzed using the normalized solutions for two earthquake ground motions with different frequency contents. Ignoring tank flexibility may significantly underestimate seismic responses of the tank and its contained fluid. The approximate solutions, which have been widely used for decades, may not be sufficiently accurate in the modern era. Calculation errors in the reviewed studies are identified and corrected, and differences are quantified for the sample tank.
Review of analytical studies on seismic fluid-structure interaction of base-supported cylindrical tanks
Yu, Ching-Ching (author) / Whittaker, Andrew S. (author)
Engineering Structures ; 233
2020-11-15
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Analytical study of cylindrical tanks including soil-structure interaction
DOAJ | 2019
|Seismic Behavior of Cylindrical Fluid-Filled Steel Tanks
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2017
|