A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Buckling behaviour of auxetic domes under external pressure
Abstract In view of ongoing great interest in novel materials exhibiting Negative Poisson Ratio (NPR), the current study examines its influence on buckling behaviour of externally pressurized torispherical pressure vessel closures. Failure pressures are computed for the range of Poisson’s ratio: −1.0 < 0.5. The following wall constructions are considered: (i) single auxetic layer, (ii) outer metallic skin supported on inside by an auxetic layer, and (iii) sandwich with auxetic core. Both metallic and auxetic layers are assumed to be isotropic, and exhibit elastic, perfectly plastic behaviour. Results of this numerical study show that the inclusion of auxetic can lead to 89% gain in failure pressures above auxetic-free configuration of the wall. The range of analysed diameter-to-wall thickness ratio varied between 666 and 2000. Two layer wall construction (metallic skin supported by auxetic layer), was found to exhibit better performance than the equivalent sandwich configuration.
Highlights Substantial influence of Negative Poisson’s ratio on buckling strength. Outer metallic skin supported on inside by auxetic layer. Sandwich with auxetic core. Auxetic layers are assumed to be isotropic, and exhibit elastic, perfectly plastic behaviour. Two layer wall construction addresses porosity and is a superior construction.
Buckling behaviour of auxetic domes under external pressure
Abstract In view of ongoing great interest in novel materials exhibiting Negative Poisson Ratio (NPR), the current study examines its influence on buckling behaviour of externally pressurized torispherical pressure vessel closures. Failure pressures are computed for the range of Poisson’s ratio: −1.0 < 0.5. The following wall constructions are considered: (i) single auxetic layer, (ii) outer metallic skin supported on inside by an auxetic layer, and (iii) sandwich with auxetic core. Both metallic and auxetic layers are assumed to be isotropic, and exhibit elastic, perfectly plastic behaviour. Results of this numerical study show that the inclusion of auxetic can lead to 89% gain in failure pressures above auxetic-free configuration of the wall. The range of analysed diameter-to-wall thickness ratio varied between 666 and 2000. Two layer wall construction (metallic skin supported by auxetic layer), was found to exhibit better performance than the equivalent sandwich configuration.
Highlights Substantial influence of Negative Poisson’s ratio on buckling strength. Outer metallic skin supported on inside by auxetic layer. Sandwich with auxetic core. Auxetic layers are assumed to be isotropic, and exhibit elastic, perfectly plastic behaviour. Two layer wall construction addresses porosity and is a superior construction.
Buckling behaviour of auxetic domes under external pressure
Błachut, J. (author)
Thin-Walled Structures ; 182
2022-10-10
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Buckling of Tube-Stiffened Prolate Domes Under External Water Pressure
Online Contents | 1995
|Buckling of prolate egg-shaped domes under hydrostatic external pressure
Elsevier | 2017
|Buckling of composite domes with localised imperfections and subjected to external pressure
British Library Online Contents | 2016
|Buckling of composite domes with localised imperfections and subjected to external pressure
British Library Online Contents | 2016
|Locally flattened or dented domes under external pressure
Elsevier | 2015
|