A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Public and self-organized land readjustment in rural China − A comparison
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9911-3501
AbstractThe role of land readjustment for urban and rural development has attracted more and more attention worldwide. Research on how land readjustment can be organized most effectively, however, is still in its infancy. This paper firstly develops a framework for comparing different organization modes of land readjustment based on transaction cost economics. It then introduces and compares two different modes of land readjustment that have recently been developed in China, i.e., a public mode and a self-organized mode. We argue, and provide evidence from two case studies in Zhejiang Province and in Sichuan Province, that the (mis)fit between the transaction attributes of land readjustment and the adopted readjustment mode greatly affects their performance. Our findings are intended to serve as a reference both for further research and for policy making on land readjustment.
HighlightsWe develop a theoretical framework for analyzing different modes of land readjustment.We introduce two modes of governing land readjustment in China, i.e., a public and a self-organized mode.We compare two cases, one of each mode, using transaction cost economics.(Mis)fit between the transaction attributes of land readjustments and the adopted modes greatly affects their performance.
Public and self-organized land readjustment in rural China − A comparison
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9911-3501
AbstractThe role of land readjustment for urban and rural development has attracted more and more attention worldwide. Research on how land readjustment can be organized most effectively, however, is still in its infancy. This paper firstly develops a framework for comparing different organization modes of land readjustment based on transaction cost economics. It then introduces and compares two different modes of land readjustment that have recently been developed in China, i.e., a public mode and a self-organized mode. We argue, and provide evidence from two case studies in Zhejiang Province and in Sichuan Province, that the (mis)fit between the transaction attributes of land readjustment and the adopted readjustment mode greatly affects their performance. Our findings are intended to serve as a reference both for further research and for policy making on land readjustment.
HighlightsWe develop a theoretical framework for analyzing different modes of land readjustment.We introduce two modes of governing land readjustment in China, i.e., a public and a self-organized mode.We compare two cases, one of each mode, using transaction cost economics.(Mis)fit between the transaction attributes of land readjustments and the adopted modes greatly affects their performance.
Public and self-organized land readjustment in rural China − A comparison
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9911-3501
AbstractThe role of land readjustment for urban and rural development has attracted more and more attention worldwide. Research on how land readjustment can be organized most effectively, however, is still in its infancy. This paper firstly develops a framework for comparing different organization modes of land readjustment based on transaction cost economics. It then introduces and compares two different modes of land readjustment that have recently been developed in China, i.e., a public mode and a self-organized mode. We argue, and provide evidence from two case studies in Zhejiang Province and in Sichuan Province, that the (mis)fit between the transaction attributes of land readjustment and the adopted readjustment mode greatly affects their performance. Our findings are intended to serve as a reference both for further research and for policy making on land readjustment.
HighlightsWe develop a theoretical framework for analyzing different modes of land readjustment.We introduce two modes of governing land readjustment in China, i.e., a public and a self-organized mode.We compare two cases, one of each mode, using transaction cost economics.(Mis)fit between the transaction attributes of land readjustments and the adopted modes greatly affects their performance.
Public and self-organized land readjustment in rural China − A comparison
Tan, Rong (author) / Heerink, Nico (author)
Journal of Rural Studies ; 53 ; 45-57
2017-04-13
13 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Public and self-organized land readjustment in rural China − A comparison
| Online Contents | 2017
Elsevier | 1983
Land Readjustment: An Innovative Urban Experiment in China
| Online Contents | 2007
LAND READJUSTMENT IMPLEMENTATIONS IN TURKEY
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996