A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Beyond neoliberal urbanism: Assembling fluid gentrification through informal housing upgrading programs in Shenzhen, China
Abstract Over the past decade, Chinese metropolitan cities, Shenzhen included, have waged large-scale gentrification campaigns through land appropriation and demolition of old neighborhoods, resulting in the financialization of the urban property market. Since 2018, however, a new gentrification scheme under the rubric “comprehensive improvement” has been introduced in Shenzhen, in which the rehabilitation and formalization of informal housing arrangements in urban villages, instead of sweeping demolition, have become the focus. Based on fieldwork in a migrant community experiencing gentrification, I argue that the new gentrification scheme is fluid in the sense that, first, it comprises an assemblage of heterogenous actors, socialist institutions, market mechanisms, and a development regime. Even though the relationships between these components are not stable, this assemblage of factors enables the state to maintain some degree of power that it uses to regulate and channel the capital involved in the scheme. Second, gentrification is not a coherent process driven by a single force inevitably towards neoliberalism. Rather, it serves multiple purposes. Other than capital accumulation, fluid gentrification also functions as infrastructure for incorporating young professionals into state-led development. Fluid gentrification therefore goes beyond neoliberalism, pioneering a post-industrial mode of urban regeneration that is unstable, temporal and flexible in nature.
Highlights A new gentrification scheme under the rubric “comprehensive improvement” has been introduced in Shenzhen, in which the rehabilitation and formalization of informal housing arrangements in urban villages, instead of sweeping demolition, have become the focus. The new gentrification scheme comprises an assemblage of heterogenous actors, socialist institutions, market mechanisms, and a development regime. This assemblage of factors enables the state to maintain some degree of power that it uses to regulate and channel the capital involved in this scheme. The relationships between the state, real estate companies and local peasant households are not stable, making the gentrification process fluid. Fluid gentrification serves multiple purposes, including capital accumulation in the market and human capital accumulation for development. Fluid gentrification goes beyond neoliberalism, pioneering a post-industrial mode of urban regeneration that is unstable and flexible in nature.
Beyond neoliberal urbanism: Assembling fluid gentrification through informal housing upgrading programs in Shenzhen, China
Abstract Over the past decade, Chinese metropolitan cities, Shenzhen included, have waged large-scale gentrification campaigns through land appropriation and demolition of old neighborhoods, resulting in the financialization of the urban property market. Since 2018, however, a new gentrification scheme under the rubric “comprehensive improvement” has been introduced in Shenzhen, in which the rehabilitation and formalization of informal housing arrangements in urban villages, instead of sweeping demolition, have become the focus. Based on fieldwork in a migrant community experiencing gentrification, I argue that the new gentrification scheme is fluid in the sense that, first, it comprises an assemblage of heterogenous actors, socialist institutions, market mechanisms, and a development regime. Even though the relationships between these components are not stable, this assemblage of factors enables the state to maintain some degree of power that it uses to regulate and channel the capital involved in the scheme. Second, gentrification is not a coherent process driven by a single force inevitably towards neoliberalism. Rather, it serves multiple purposes. Other than capital accumulation, fluid gentrification also functions as infrastructure for incorporating young professionals into state-led development. Fluid gentrification therefore goes beyond neoliberalism, pioneering a post-industrial mode of urban regeneration that is unstable, temporal and flexible in nature.
Highlights A new gentrification scheme under the rubric “comprehensive improvement” has been introduced in Shenzhen, in which the rehabilitation and formalization of informal housing arrangements in urban villages, instead of sweeping demolition, have become the focus. The new gentrification scheme comprises an assemblage of heterogenous actors, socialist institutions, market mechanisms, and a development regime. This assemblage of factors enables the state to maintain some degree of power that it uses to regulate and channel the capital involved in this scheme. The relationships between the state, real estate companies and local peasant households are not stable, making the gentrification process fluid. Fluid gentrification serves multiple purposes, including capital accumulation in the market and human capital accumulation for development. Fluid gentrification goes beyond neoliberalism, pioneering a post-industrial mode of urban regeneration that is unstable and flexible in nature.
Beyond neoliberal urbanism: Assembling fluid gentrification through informal housing upgrading programs in Shenzhen, China
Zhan, Yang (author)
Cities ; 112
2021-01-16
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Informal recyclers' geographies of surviving neoliberal urbanism in Vancouver, BC
| BASE | 2016
| Online Contents | 2013
Black aesthetic emplacement: Thinking beyond neoliberal capitalist explanations of gentrification
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2020
Gentrification and revanchist urbanism in Taipei?
| Online Contents | 2016