A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Dimensions of women’s mobility, livelihoods and vulnerability in artisanal and small-scale mining-induced local economy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5099-4555
Abstract Dominant artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) narratives highlight the invisibility of women’s livelihoods and gendered struggles in the sector. Indeed, livelihood practices in ASM, how daily mobilities facilitate these practices and the specific vulnerabilities women face are still understudied and undertheorised. Drawing on qualitative research in Prestea-Bondaye mining area (PBMA), Ghana, we explore the livelihood dimensions, forms of mobility and vulnerabilities of women in ASM from an open rural economy perspective where ASM serves as a centrifugal force that pulls or drives the emergence and sustenance of both farm and other off-farm livelihood activities. Our findings highlight two forms of mobility (i.e. outside the mining communities to ASM spaces, and to/within the mining communities) that are tied to different livelihood practices and vulnerabilities. From our inquiry, women build livelihoods in an ASM-induced local economy in three different forms: permanent, temporary, and indirect. The indirect livelihoods women build in an ASM-induced local economy include: 1) ‘san ban ho’ (side-work livelihood based on credit conditions), 2) petty-trading in ASM spaces, 3) home-based trading, 4) market-day trading, 5) commuting trading, and 6) underground pit ‘ghetto’ sponsorship. The findings show that while daily mobility shape the viability of livelihood-building efforts in an ASM-induced local economy, in most cases women experience different social and economic vulnerabilities that impact their health and livelihood benefits. Implications of our findings for policy and practice are further discussed.
Highlights There are different dimensions of women’s livelihoods in an artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) – induced economy. Women’s livelihoods fall under three forms: temporary, permanent, and indirect. Livelihood building in ASM is aided by two forms of mobility: To ASM spaces, and to/within the mining communities. Women building livelihoods in ASM have different vulnerabilities. Conceptualise two stylised local rural economies to explain women’s livelihood building; semi-closed and open rural economy.
Dimensions of women’s mobility, livelihoods and vulnerability in artisanal and small-scale mining-induced local economy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5099-4555
Abstract Dominant artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) narratives highlight the invisibility of women’s livelihoods and gendered struggles in the sector. Indeed, livelihood practices in ASM, how daily mobilities facilitate these practices and the specific vulnerabilities women face are still understudied and undertheorised. Drawing on qualitative research in Prestea-Bondaye mining area (PBMA), Ghana, we explore the livelihood dimensions, forms of mobility and vulnerabilities of women in ASM from an open rural economy perspective where ASM serves as a centrifugal force that pulls or drives the emergence and sustenance of both farm and other off-farm livelihood activities. Our findings highlight two forms of mobility (i.e. outside the mining communities to ASM spaces, and to/within the mining communities) that are tied to different livelihood practices and vulnerabilities. From our inquiry, women build livelihoods in an ASM-induced local economy in three different forms: permanent, temporary, and indirect. The indirect livelihoods women build in an ASM-induced local economy include: 1) ‘san ban ho’ (side-work livelihood based on credit conditions), 2) petty-trading in ASM spaces, 3) home-based trading, 4) market-day trading, 5) commuting trading, and 6) underground pit ‘ghetto’ sponsorship. The findings show that while daily mobility shape the viability of livelihood-building efforts in an ASM-induced local economy, in most cases women experience different social and economic vulnerabilities that impact their health and livelihood benefits. Implications of our findings for policy and practice are further discussed.
Highlights There are different dimensions of women’s livelihoods in an artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) – induced economy. Women’s livelihoods fall under three forms: temporary, permanent, and indirect. Livelihood building in ASM is aided by two forms of mobility: To ASM spaces, and to/within the mining communities. Women building livelihoods in ASM have different vulnerabilities. Conceptualise two stylised local rural economies to explain women’s livelihood building; semi-closed and open rural economy.
Dimensions of women’s mobility, livelihoods and vulnerability in artisanal and small-scale mining-induced local economy
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5099-4555
Abstract Dominant artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) narratives highlight the invisibility of women’s livelihoods and gendered struggles in the sector. Indeed, livelihood practices in ASM, how daily mobilities facilitate these practices and the specific vulnerabilities women face are still understudied and undertheorised. Drawing on qualitative research in Prestea-Bondaye mining area (PBMA), Ghana, we explore the livelihood dimensions, forms of mobility and vulnerabilities of women in ASM from an open rural economy perspective where ASM serves as a centrifugal force that pulls or drives the emergence and sustenance of both farm and other off-farm livelihood activities. Our findings highlight two forms of mobility (i.e. outside the mining communities to ASM spaces, and to/within the mining communities) that are tied to different livelihood practices and vulnerabilities. From our inquiry, women build livelihoods in an ASM-induced local economy in three different forms: permanent, temporary, and indirect. The indirect livelihoods women build in an ASM-induced local economy include: 1) ‘san ban ho’ (side-work livelihood based on credit conditions), 2) petty-trading in ASM spaces, 3) home-based trading, 4) market-day trading, 5) commuting trading, and 6) underground pit ‘ghetto’ sponsorship. The findings show that while daily mobility shape the viability of livelihood-building efforts in an ASM-induced local economy, in most cases women experience different social and economic vulnerabilities that impact their health and livelihood benefits. Implications of our findings for policy and practice are further discussed.
Highlights There are different dimensions of women’s livelihoods in an artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) – induced economy. Women’s livelihoods fall under three forms: temporary, permanent, and indirect. Livelihood building in ASM is aided by two forms of mobility: To ASM spaces, and to/within the mining communities. Women building livelihoods in ASM have different vulnerabilities. Conceptualise two stylised local rural economies to explain women’s livelihood building; semi-closed and open rural economy.
Dimensions of women’s mobility, livelihoods and vulnerability in artisanal and small-scale mining-induced local economy
Arthur-Holmes, Francis (author) / Yeboah, Thomas (author) / Abrefa Busia, Kwaku (author)
Journal of Rural Studies ; 101
2023-06-20
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Conserving Tropical Forests: Can Sustainable Livelihoods Outperform Artisanal or Informal Mining?
| DOAJ | 2018