A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The effect of neighbourhood and urban center structures on active travel in small cities
Abstract Densification is the key intervention strategy proposed in the urban sustainability planning literature. Nevertheless, the blueprint for action is still vague, and especially so in small cities. Is, for example, the premise for and reward of densification relatively transferable between city scales? In addition, does difference in centre structures and distribution of facilities in small cities have an implication for active travel? By focusing on three Norwegian small cities, this paper addresses how built environment and attitudes influence active travel behaviour in small cities with different centre structures. Using descriptive statistics, ANOVA test and negative binomial regression on survey data, the paper finds that attitude towards active travel as well as accessibility significantly influence walk/bike trip frequency. Moreover, variation in small-city centre structure has an important implication for active travel but the effect varies between facility types.
Highlights Theoretical premise on the causal mechanism between urban form and travel behaviour in small city context is laid out. City-scale built environment factors are strong predictors of average accessibility by active modes in small cities. Attitude towards active modes strongly contributes to the propensity for active travel when alternative modes are available. Distribution of facilities that optimizes active travel in a small city differs by facility categories.
The effect of neighbourhood and urban center structures on active travel in small cities
Abstract Densification is the key intervention strategy proposed in the urban sustainability planning literature. Nevertheless, the blueprint for action is still vague, and especially so in small cities. Is, for example, the premise for and reward of densification relatively transferable between city scales? In addition, does difference in centre structures and distribution of facilities in small cities have an implication for active travel? By focusing on three Norwegian small cities, this paper addresses how built environment and attitudes influence active travel behaviour in small cities with different centre structures. Using descriptive statistics, ANOVA test and negative binomial regression on survey data, the paper finds that attitude towards active travel as well as accessibility significantly influence walk/bike trip frequency. Moreover, variation in small-city centre structure has an important implication for active travel but the effect varies between facility types.
Highlights Theoretical premise on the causal mechanism between urban form and travel behaviour in small city context is laid out. City-scale built environment factors are strong predictors of average accessibility by active modes in small cities. Attitude towards active modes strongly contributes to the propensity for active travel when alternative modes are available. Distribution of facilities that optimizes active travel in a small city differs by facility categories.
The effect of neighbourhood and urban center structures on active travel in small cities
Wolday, Fitwi (author)
Cities ; 132
2022-10-19
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Neighbourhood Accessibility and Active Travel
| Online Contents | 2012
Neighbourhood Accessibility and Active Travel
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2012
| Elsevier | 2025
Investigating contestation around neighbourhood scale active travel infrastructure policy
| Elsevier | 2024