A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Transportation service bundling – For whose benefit? Consumer valuation of pure bundling in the passenger transportation market
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8972-8468
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3331-1318
Highlights Consumers’ valuation of bundling and service integration was calculated. PT, car-sharing and park and ride were valuated higher when offered in a bundle. Bicycle sharing, e-bike sharing and taxi were valuated higher as stand-alone. WTP for a smartphone app that integrates transportation services was high.
Abstract Novel approaches to service bundling in the passenger transportation market are enabled by technology driven innovations and give rise to so called Mobility as a Service (MaaS) concepts. These approaches promise to increase the accessibility of existing public transportation services, possibly decrease car ownership rates and lower the environmental burden of the transportation system. However, the potential effects of comprehensive service bundles in the passenger transportation market are still largely unclear. In a competitive market, the potential success of MaaS bundles follows consumer valuation of the bundles as compared to valuation of stand-alone services. Thus, the difference between the bundle and sum-of-parts willingness to pay (WTP) is an indicator for the valuation of the bundling itself (which includes service integration valuation) and effects the competitiveness of the service bundles. In this study, several discrete choice experiments were conducted to indirectly estimate consumers' WTP for stand-alone transportation services and service bundles. The results indicate that public transportation, car sharing, and park and ride services are valuated significantly higher when offered in a bundle instead of as a stand-alone service. Bicycle-sharing, electrical bicycle (e-bike) sharing and taxi services are valuated lower. Potential consumers also exhibit a high WTP for a smartphone application that integrates the services and manages ticketing and payment. Consequently, subscription-based pure bundles for all transportation modes may not be the optimal strategy for mobility providers. Instead, it may be better to bundle public transportation with car sharing and park and ride to exploit the higher WTP and offer (electric) bicycle-sharing and taxi services on a pay-per-use basis. In this way, profitability of a public transportation system could be increased.
Transportation service bundling – For whose benefit? Consumer valuation of pure bundling in the passenger transportation market
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8972-8468
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3331-1318
Highlights Consumers’ valuation of bundling and service integration was calculated. PT, car-sharing and park and ride were valuated higher when offered in a bundle. Bicycle sharing, e-bike sharing and taxi were valuated higher as stand-alone. WTP for a smartphone app that integrates transportation services was high.
Abstract Novel approaches to service bundling in the passenger transportation market are enabled by technology driven innovations and give rise to so called Mobility as a Service (MaaS) concepts. These approaches promise to increase the accessibility of existing public transportation services, possibly decrease car ownership rates and lower the environmental burden of the transportation system. However, the potential effects of comprehensive service bundles in the passenger transportation market are still largely unclear. In a competitive market, the potential success of MaaS bundles follows consumer valuation of the bundles as compared to valuation of stand-alone services. Thus, the difference between the bundle and sum-of-parts willingness to pay (WTP) is an indicator for the valuation of the bundling itself (which includes service integration valuation) and effects the competitiveness of the service bundles. In this study, several discrete choice experiments were conducted to indirectly estimate consumers' WTP for stand-alone transportation services and service bundles. The results indicate that public transportation, car sharing, and park and ride services are valuated significantly higher when offered in a bundle instead of as a stand-alone service. Bicycle-sharing, electrical bicycle (e-bike) sharing and taxi services are valuated lower. Potential consumers also exhibit a high WTP for a smartphone application that integrates the services and manages ticketing and payment. Consequently, subscription-based pure bundles for all transportation modes may not be the optimal strategy for mobility providers. Instead, it may be better to bundle public transportation with car sharing and park and ride to exploit the higher WTP and offer (electric) bicycle-sharing and taxi services on a pay-per-use basis. In this way, profitability of a public transportation system could be increased.
Transportation service bundling – For whose benefit? Consumer valuation of pure bundling in the passenger transportation market
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8972-8468
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3331-1318
Highlights Consumers’ valuation of bundling and service integration was calculated. PT, car-sharing and park and ride were valuated higher when offered in a bundle. Bicycle sharing, e-bike sharing and taxi were valuated higher as stand-alone. WTP for a smartphone app that integrates transportation services was high.
Abstract Novel approaches to service bundling in the passenger transportation market are enabled by technology driven innovations and give rise to so called Mobility as a Service (MaaS) concepts. These approaches promise to increase the accessibility of existing public transportation services, possibly decrease car ownership rates and lower the environmental burden of the transportation system. However, the potential effects of comprehensive service bundles in the passenger transportation market are still largely unclear. In a competitive market, the potential success of MaaS bundles follows consumer valuation of the bundles as compared to valuation of stand-alone services. Thus, the difference between the bundle and sum-of-parts willingness to pay (WTP) is an indicator for the valuation of the bundling itself (which includes service integration valuation) and effects the competitiveness of the service bundles. In this study, several discrete choice experiments were conducted to indirectly estimate consumers' WTP for stand-alone transportation services and service bundles. The results indicate that public transportation, car sharing, and park and ride services are valuated significantly higher when offered in a bundle instead of as a stand-alone service. Bicycle-sharing, electrical bicycle (e-bike) sharing and taxi services are valuated lower. Potential consumers also exhibit a high WTP for a smartphone application that integrates the services and manages ticketing and payment. Consequently, subscription-based pure bundles for all transportation modes may not be the optimal strategy for mobility providers. Instead, it may be better to bundle public transportation with car sharing and park and ride to exploit the higher WTP and offer (electric) bicycle-sharing and taxi services on a pay-per-use basis. In this way, profitability of a public transportation system could be increased.
Transportation service bundling – For whose benefit? Consumer valuation of pure bundling in the passenger transportation market
Guidon, Sergio (author) / Wicki, Michael (author) / Bernauer, Thomas (author) / Axhausen, Kay (author)
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice ; 131 ; 91-106
2019-01-01
16 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Automatic steel cage bundling device and bundling method
| European Patent Office | 2024
Steel pipe bundling assembly and steel pipe bundling device
| European Patent Office | 2020