A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Unnecessary inconvenience and compensation within the party wall legislation
Examines the obligations to avoid unnecessary inconvenience and to pay compensation for loss or damage within the Party Wall, etc. Act 1996. Considers the argument that the two obligations are directly related. Demonstrates that the obligation to pay compensation only relates to work lawfully undertaken under the Act and that the obligation to avoid unnecessary inconvenience exists to define the limits of such work. Concludes that the two obligations are separate but complementary aspects of the statutory code and that no direct relationship exists between the two.
Unnecessary inconvenience and compensation within the party wall legislation
Examines the obligations to avoid unnecessary inconvenience and to pay compensation for loss or damage within the Party Wall, etc. Act 1996. Considers the argument that the two obligations are directly related. Demonstrates that the obligation to pay compensation only relates to work lawfully undertaken under the Act and that the obligation to avoid unnecessary inconvenience exists to define the limits of such work. Concludes that the two obligations are separate but complementary aspects of the statutory code and that no direct relationship exists between the two.
Unnecessary inconvenience and compensation within the party wall legislation
Chynoweth, Paul (author)
Structural Survey ; 18 ; 99-105
2000-05-01
7 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Unnecessary inconvenience and compensation within the party wall legislation
British Library Online Contents | 2000
|Fire Legislation – Is It an Unnecessary Burden
Emerald Group Publishing | 1994
|Making sense of the party wall legislation: still no easy task
Online Contents | 2002
|Making sense of the party wall legislation: still no easy task
Emerald Group Publishing | 2002
|