A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Is good enough “making do”?
An investigation of inappropriate processing in a small design and build company
–
The purpose of this study is to address behaviour that often leads to inappropriate processing in a small design and build contracting organisation that employs direct labour. The objective was to reduce process waste and improve the value delivered to clients. This formed part of a larger knowledge transfer project (KTP) to improve performance on construction sites through the application of lean thinking.
Action research was used to identify and bring about change within the contracting organisation. The method was applied to live construction projects in the social housing sector in the greater London area. The intervention was to raise the awareness of site personnel to the importance of finishing tasks through informal discussions and visual management techniques.
Raised awareness of the importance of finishing work to allow other trades to follow on unimpeded, leading to significant improvements in the quality and flow of work. This helped to contribute to significant savings in time and cost.
Findings relate to a small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with directly employed labour, therefore the findings have limited applicability. Further applied research is required to determine the generalisation of the approach/findings to organisations that subcontract their labour.
This applied research is practical and cost effective to apply to live projects managed by small and medium sized contracting organisations.
Provides a unique insight into the practical application of lean thinking tools and process improvement.
Is good enough “making do”?
An investigation of inappropriate processing in a small design and build company
–
The purpose of this study is to address behaviour that often leads to inappropriate processing in a small design and build contracting organisation that employs direct labour. The objective was to reduce process waste and improve the value delivered to clients. This formed part of a larger knowledge transfer project (KTP) to improve performance on construction sites through the application of lean thinking.
Action research was used to identify and bring about change within the contracting organisation. The method was applied to live construction projects in the social housing sector in the greater London area. The intervention was to raise the awareness of site personnel to the importance of finishing tasks through informal discussions and visual management techniques.
Raised awareness of the importance of finishing work to allow other trades to follow on unimpeded, leading to significant improvements in the quality and flow of work. This helped to contribute to significant savings in time and cost.
Findings relate to a small to medium-sized enterprise (SME) with directly employed labour, therefore the findings have limited applicability. Further applied research is required to determine the generalisation of the approach/findings to organisations that subcontract their labour.
This applied research is practical and cost effective to apply to live projects managed by small and medium sized contracting organisations.
Provides a unique insight into the practical application of lean thinking tools and process improvement.
Is good enough “making do”?
An investigation of inappropriate processing in a small design and build company
Emmitt, Stephen (author) / Pasquire, Christine (author) / Mertia, Basant (author)
Construction Innovation ; 12 ; 369-383
2012-07-06
15 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
British Library Online Contents | 2000
LANDMARK SERIES - How Good is Good Enough?
| Online Contents | 2003
| Online Contents | 1994
Developing Officers as Instructors: Is ``Good'' Good Enough?
| British Library Online Contents | 2018
Are Inundation Maps Good Enough Anymore?
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2021