A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
The impact of design on workflow: a comparative case study of level I trauma rooms
This study aims to examine trauma room staff’s perception of factors that influence workflow in trauma care from a physical environment standpoint.
A semi-structured focus group method was used. Trauma team members, representative of various roles within a team, were recruited from five Level I trauma centers in the USA, through a convenience sampling method. A total of 53 participants were recruited to participate in online focus groups. The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model was used to analyze the findings.
In addition to factors directly related to the physical environment, aspects of people and technology, such as crowding and access to technology, were found to be related to the physical environment. Examples of factors that improve or hinder workflow are layout design, appropriate room size, doors, sink locations, access to resources such as X-ray or blood and access to technology. Seamless and uninterrupted workflow is crucial in achieving efficient and safe care in the time-pressured environments of trauma rooms. To support workflow, the physical environment can offer solutions through effective layout design, thoughtful location of resources and technology and room size.
Trauma rooms are time-pressured and complex environments where seconds matter to save a patient’s life. Ensuring safe and efficient care requires seamless workflow. However, the literature on workflow in trauma rooms is limited.
The impact of design on workflow: a comparative case study of level I trauma rooms
This study aims to examine trauma room staff’s perception of factors that influence workflow in trauma care from a physical environment standpoint.
A semi-structured focus group method was used. Trauma team members, representative of various roles within a team, were recruited from five Level I trauma centers in the USA, through a convenience sampling method. A total of 53 participants were recruited to participate in online focus groups. The Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model was used to analyze the findings.
In addition to factors directly related to the physical environment, aspects of people and technology, such as crowding and access to technology, were found to be related to the physical environment. Examples of factors that improve or hinder workflow are layout design, appropriate room size, doors, sink locations, access to resources such as X-ray or blood and access to technology. Seamless and uninterrupted workflow is crucial in achieving efficient and safe care in the time-pressured environments of trauma rooms. To support workflow, the physical environment can offer solutions through effective layout design, thoughtful location of resources and technology and room size.
Trauma rooms are time-pressured and complex environments where seconds matter to save a patient’s life. Ensuring safe and efficient care requires seamless workflow. However, the literature on workflow in trauma rooms is limited.
The impact of design on workflow: a comparative case study of level I trauma rooms
Bayramzadeh, Sara (author) / Chiu, Leong Yin Tanya (author)
Facilities ; 40 ; 475-494
2022-03-04
1 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Adaptive Rooms, Virtual Collaboration and Cognitive Workflow
| Springer Verlag | 1998
Adaptive Rooms, Virtual Collaboration and Cognitive Workflow
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
| TIBKAT | 1989
| TIBKAT | 1988
| Emerald Group Publishing | 2024