A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
User-centric work environments in modular healthcare facilities
The challenges arising from the reform of the social and healthcare sector call for efficient, effective and novel processes in both public and private health and medical care. Facilities need to be designed to suit the new processes and to offer usable workspaces at different levels of healthcare services. Along with traditional construction, modular facility innovations could be one solution to these pressures. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
This case study analyzed the different usability characteristics of the work environment in modular and non-modular healthcare facilities (HCFs). The qualitative research method was based on semi-structured interviews of employees and observations of the case buildings.
According to the results, the usability characteristics were divided into four main categories: functionality, healthiness, safety/security and comfort. The main differences between the modular and non-modular facilities appeared to be room size, soundproofing, safety issues and the utilization of colors and artwork, which were all perceived as better realized in the non-modular facilities. The staff highlighted functionality as the most important characteristic in their work environment. They even considered functionality as a feature of a comfortable work environment.
This paper presents new knowledge and a detailed description of the opinions and experiences of healthcare professionals concerning a user-centric, usable environment in the context of modular and non-modular HCFs.
User-centric work environments in modular healthcare facilities
The challenges arising from the reform of the social and healthcare sector call for efficient, effective and novel processes in both public and private health and medical care. Facilities need to be designed to suit the new processes and to offer usable workspaces at different levels of healthcare services. Along with traditional construction, modular facility innovations could be one solution to these pressures. The paper aims to discuss these issues.
This case study analyzed the different usability characteristics of the work environment in modular and non-modular healthcare facilities (HCFs). The qualitative research method was based on semi-structured interviews of employees and observations of the case buildings.
According to the results, the usability characteristics were divided into four main categories: functionality, healthiness, safety/security and comfort. The main differences between the modular and non-modular facilities appeared to be room size, soundproofing, safety issues and the utilization of colors and artwork, which were all perceived as better realized in the non-modular facilities. The staff highlighted functionality as the most important characteristic in their work environment. They even considered functionality as a feature of a comfortable work environment.
This paper presents new knowledge and a detailed description of the opinions and experiences of healthcare professionals concerning a user-centric, usable environment in the context of modular and non-modular HCFs.
User-centric work environments in modular healthcare facilities
User-centric work environments
Aalto, Leena (author) / Sirola, Pia (author) / Kalliomäki-Levanto, Tiina (author) / Lahtinen, Marjaana (author) / Ruohomäki, Virpi (author) / Salonen, Heidi (author) / Reijula, Kari (author)
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management ; 26 ; 1047-1062
2019-02-28
16 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Possibilities for user-centric and participatory design in modular health care facilities
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2020
User-centric facilities management: a de-centralised approach
| Online Contents | 2004
User-centric facilities management: a de-centralised approach
| Emerald Group Publishing | 2004
User-centric facilities management: a de-centralised approach
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2004