A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Because of the limitations of the analytical approach to rating bridges in the current AASHTO specifications, proof-load testing is often a desirable alternative rating method. The study reported here examined the feasibility of a proof-load testing program for New York, addressing both economic and technical aspects. Such a program with clearly defined application areas is found to be cost-effective. Two technical objectives are identified, based on review of current practice elsewhere: (1) prescription of the target proof load, and (2) development of a detailed procedure manual to guide typical proof-load tests. These tasks were completed and the results (including a draft text of the manual) are presented in this report.
Because of the limitations of the analytical approach to rating bridges in the current AASHTO specifications, proof-load testing is often a desirable alternative rating method. The study reported here examined the feasibility of a proof-load testing program for New York, addressing both economic and technical aspects. Such a program with clearly defined application areas is found to be cost-effective. Two technical objectives are identified, based on review of current practice elsewhere: (1) prescription of the target proof load, and (2) development of a detailed procedure manual to guide typical proof-load tests. These tasks were completed and the results (including a draft text of the manual) are presented in this report.
Highway Bridge Rating by Nondestructive Proof-Load Testing for Consistent Safety
G. Fu (author)
1995
76 pages
Report
No indication
English
Proof Load Formula for Highway Bridge Rating
British Library Online Contents | 1992
|Load rating of highway bridges by proof-loading
Springer Verlag | 2013
|Load rating of highway bridges by proof-loading
Online Contents | 2013
|Bridge-Condition Assessment and Load Rating Using Nondestructive Evaluation Methods
British Library Online Contents | 2000
|