A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Evaluation of Error Indices of Radar Rain Rate Targeting Rainfall-Runoff Analysis
AbstractThis study evaluates several error indices of the radar rain rate from the viewpoint of the accuracy of rainfall-runoff analysis. The error indices considered in this study are the mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), normalized standard deviation (NSD), correlation coefficient (CC), bias (BS), and radar rain rate quality criterion (RRQC). These indices were analyzed using the concept of sum of squares (SS) and mean squares (MS) in the analysis of variance (ANOVA), which explains how the bias and random error of the radar rain rate are combined in an error index. Also, these error indices were linked to the errors in the runoff result, such as the total runoff volume, peak flow, and peak time. As an application, two dam basins in Korea were selected, the Chungju Dam basin and the Namgang Dam basin. The radar rain rates from Gwangdeoksan Radar and Gudeoksan Radar were used as input for the rainfall-runoff analysis. Six different rainfall events were applied to secure various rainfall types. As a result, it was found that ME, BS, and RRQC were linearly proportional to the errors in the runoff result. This result indicates that the bias plays a dominant role in the evaluation of the radar rain rate, targeting the rainfall-runoff analysis.
Evaluation of Error Indices of Radar Rain Rate Targeting Rainfall-Runoff Analysis
AbstractThis study evaluates several error indices of the radar rain rate from the viewpoint of the accuracy of rainfall-runoff analysis. The error indices considered in this study are the mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), normalized standard deviation (NSD), correlation coefficient (CC), bias (BS), and radar rain rate quality criterion (RRQC). These indices were analyzed using the concept of sum of squares (SS) and mean squares (MS) in the analysis of variance (ANOVA), which explains how the bias and random error of the radar rain rate are combined in an error index. Also, these error indices were linked to the errors in the runoff result, such as the total runoff volume, peak flow, and peak time. As an application, two dam basins in Korea were selected, the Chungju Dam basin and the Namgang Dam basin. The radar rain rates from Gwangdeoksan Radar and Gudeoksan Radar were used as input for the rainfall-runoff analysis. Six different rainfall events were applied to secure various rainfall types. As a result, it was found that ME, BS, and RRQC were linearly proportional to the errors in the runoff result. This result indicates that the bias plays a dominant role in the evaluation of the radar rain rate, targeting the rainfall-runoff analysis.
Evaluation of Error Indices of Radar Rain Rate Targeting Rainfall-Runoff Analysis
Yoo, Chulsang (author) / Ku, JungMo / Kim, Jungho / Yoon, Jungsoo
2016
Article (Journal)
English
Evaluation of Error Indices of Radar Rain Rate Targeting Rainfall-Runoff Analysis
| Online Contents | 2016
Comparison of rain gauge and radar data as input to an urban rainfall-runoff model
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
Effect of Radar-Rainfall Errors on Rainfall-Runoff Modeling
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
Rainfall Studies Using Rain-Gage Networks and Radar
| ASCE | 2021