A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Unlocking the mind-trap: Politicising urban theory and practice
This contribution offers a critical engagement with the Critical Commentary paper of Beveridge and Koch (2017) entitled ‘The postpolitical trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city’. I argue that post-politicisation as a particular form of de-politicisation does not imply the disappearance of politics. On the contrary, it involves the re-ordering of the modalities of politics (contentious or otherwise) and of the possibilities of the political with far-reaching consequences for the modalities of egalitarian and emancipatory urban change. I explore the key contours of the post-politicisation argument and develop the thesis that ‘the political’ can never be foreclosed fully.
Unlocking the mind-trap: Politicising urban theory and practice
This contribution offers a critical engagement with the Critical Commentary paper of Beveridge and Koch (2017) entitled ‘The postpolitical trap? Reflections on politics, agency and the city’. I argue that post-politicisation as a particular form of de-politicisation does not imply the disappearance of politics. On the contrary, it involves the re-ordering of the modalities of politics (contentious or otherwise) and of the possibilities of the political with far-reaching consequences for the modalities of egalitarian and emancipatory urban change. I explore the key contours of the post-politicisation argument and develop the thesis that ‘the political’ can never be foreclosed fully.
Unlocking the mind-trap: Politicising urban theory and practice
Swyngedouw, Erik (author)
Urban studies ; 54
2017
Article (Journal)
English
Unlocking the mind-trap: Politicising urban theory and practice
Online Contents | 2016
|Everyday experiences of post-politicising processes in rural freshwater management
Online Contents | 2017
|Politicising the debate on urban sprawl: The case of the Lyon metropolitan region
BASE | 2021
|