A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Cost-benefit evaluation of self-centring concentrically braced frames considering uncertainties
Self-centring concentrically braced frame (SC-CBF) systems have been developed to reduce post-earthquake damages in braced frames. However, due to special details required by the SC-CBF system, the construction cost of an SC-CBF is expected to be higher than that of a conventional CBF. In this study, the seismic performance and economic effectiveness of two prototype buildings utilising SC-CBFs are assessed and compared with buildings utilising conventional CBFs by evaluating the annual probabilities of exceeding various damage levels, expected annual losses, life cycle costs (under seismic hazard) and economic benefit of using SC-CBFs considering prevailing uncertainties. The results of this study show that the SC-CBF buildings have lower drift-related losses but higher acceleration-related losses. The SC-CBF is found to be beneficial for the 6-storey configuration, but not for the 10-storey configuration. For the 6-storey buildings studied here, if the construction cost of the SC-CBF is assumed to be twice that of the CBF, the pay-off time is expected to be 12 to 21 years, with a probability of 68%, considering the uncertainties in the demand, capacity, loss parameters and initial construction costs. Finally, appropriate probabilistic engineering demand parameter model formulation is critical for generating accurate loss analysis results.
Cost-benefit evaluation of self-centring concentrically braced frames considering uncertainties
Self-centring concentrically braced frame (SC-CBF) systems have been developed to reduce post-earthquake damages in braced frames. However, due to special details required by the SC-CBF system, the construction cost of an SC-CBF is expected to be higher than that of a conventional CBF. In this study, the seismic performance and economic effectiveness of two prototype buildings utilising SC-CBFs are assessed and compared with buildings utilising conventional CBFs by evaluating the annual probabilities of exceeding various damage levels, expected annual losses, life cycle costs (under seismic hazard) and economic benefit of using SC-CBFs considering prevailing uncertainties. The results of this study show that the SC-CBF buildings have lower drift-related losses but higher acceleration-related losses. The SC-CBF is found to be beneficial for the 6-storey configuration, but not for the 10-storey configuration. For the 6-storey buildings studied here, if the construction cost of the SC-CBF is assumed to be twice that of the CBF, the pay-off time is expected to be 12 to 21 years, with a probability of 68%, considering the uncertainties in the demand, capacity, loss parameters and initial construction costs. Finally, appropriate probabilistic engineering demand parameter model formulation is critical for generating accurate loss analysis results.
Cost-benefit evaluation of self-centring concentrically braced frames considering uncertainties
Dyanati, Mojtaba (author) / Huang, Qindan / Roke, David
2017
Article (Journal)
English
Cost-benefit evaluation of self-centring concentrically braced frames considering uncertainties
| Online Contents | 2016
Cost-benefit evaluation of self-centring concentrically braced frames considering uncertainties
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2017
Validation of a Numerical Model for Novel Self-Centring Concentrically Braced Steel Frames
| DOAJ | 2024
Life cycle cost-benefit evaluation of self-centering and conventional concentrically braced frames
| BASE | 2015