A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Aggregate Objective Functions and Pareto Frontiers: Required Relationships and Practical Implications
Abstract This paper addresses the problem of capturing Pareto optimal points on non-convex Pareto frontiers, which are encountered in nonlinear multiobjective optimization problems in computational engineering design optimization. The emphasis is on the choice of the aggregate objective function (AOF) of the objectives that is employed to capture Pareto optimal points. A fundamental property of the aggregate objective function, the admissibility property, is developed and its equivalence to the coordinatewise increasing property is established. Necessary and sufficient conditions for such an admissible aggregate objective function to capture Pareto optimal points are derived. Numerical examples illustrate these conditions in the biobjective case. This paper demonstrates in general terms the limitation of the popular weighted-sum AOF approach, which captures only convex Pareto frontiers, and helps us understand why some commonly used AOFs cannot capture desirable Pareto optimal points, and how to avoid this situation in practice. Since nearly all applications of optimization in engineering design involve the formation of AOFs, this paper is of direct theoretical and practical usefulness.
Aggregate Objective Functions and Pareto Frontiers: Required Relationships and Practical Implications
Abstract This paper addresses the problem of capturing Pareto optimal points on non-convex Pareto frontiers, which are encountered in nonlinear multiobjective optimization problems in computational engineering design optimization. The emphasis is on the choice of the aggregate objective function (AOF) of the objectives that is employed to capture Pareto optimal points. A fundamental property of the aggregate objective function, the admissibility property, is developed and its equivalence to the coordinatewise increasing property is established. Necessary and sufficient conditions for such an admissible aggregate objective function to capture Pareto optimal points are derived. Numerical examples illustrate these conditions in the biobjective case. This paper demonstrates in general terms the limitation of the popular weighted-sum AOF approach, which captures only convex Pareto frontiers, and helps us understand why some commonly used AOFs cannot capture desirable Pareto optimal points, and how to avoid this situation in practice. Since nearly all applications of optimization in engineering design involve the formation of AOFs, this paper is of direct theoretical and practical usefulness.
Aggregate Objective Functions and Pareto Frontiers: Required Relationships and Practical Implications
Messac, Achille (author) / Puemi-Sukam, Cyriaque (author) / Melachrinoudis, Emanuel (author)
2000
Article (Journal)
English
Considering dynamic Pareto frontiers in decision making
Online Contents | 2013
|Considering dynamic Pareto frontiers in decision making
Springer Verlag | 2013
|L-dominance: An approximate-domination mechanism for adaptive resolution of Pareto frontiers
British Library Online Contents | 2015
|Pareto surface construction for multi-objective optimization under uncertainty
British Library Online Contents | 2017
|