A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Relation of relative resistance of metals to cavitation intensity
Conclusions The relative cavitation resistance of metals depends on the intensity of cavitation. As the cavitation intensity decreases in connection with an increase of the effect of the corrosion factor, the erosion coefficient $ K_{e} $ of carbon and low-alloy steels increases tens of times with respect to stainless steel.The intensity of the cavitation conditions occurring during operation of hydraulic machines and on laboratory test stands should be evaluated on the basis of the value of $ K_{e} $. In this case, the larger the values of $ K_{e} $, the smaller the cavitation intensity. For example, under conditions of the turbines of the Bratsk station (increased cavitation intensity), where v=4 mm/yr, $ K_{e} $=3–5, and under the operating conditions of the turbines of the Volga stations (moderate cavitation intensity), where v=0.4 mm/yr, $ K_{e} $=17–29.It is recommended to check the correspondence of the characteristics of the cavitation resistance of metal in laboratory tests to the operating conditions of hydraulic machines by comparing the value of $ K_{e} $ (obtained for a known grade of carbon steel in comparison with stainless steel) with the value of $ K_{e} $ for the same such steels obtained under the operating conditions of the hydraulic machine.
Relation of relative resistance of metals to cavitation intensity
Conclusions The relative cavitation resistance of metals depends on the intensity of cavitation. As the cavitation intensity decreases in connection with an increase of the effect of the corrosion factor, the erosion coefficient $ K_{e} $ of carbon and low-alloy steels increases tens of times with respect to stainless steel.The intensity of the cavitation conditions occurring during operation of hydraulic machines and on laboratory test stands should be evaluated on the basis of the value of $ K_{e} $. In this case, the larger the values of $ K_{e} $, the smaller the cavitation intensity. For example, under conditions of the turbines of the Bratsk station (increased cavitation intensity), where v=4 mm/yr, $ K_{e} $=3–5, and under the operating conditions of the turbines of the Volga stations (moderate cavitation intensity), where v=0.4 mm/yr, $ K_{e} $=17–29.It is recommended to check the correspondence of the characteristics of the cavitation resistance of metal in laboratory tests to the operating conditions of hydraulic machines by comparing the value of $ K_{e} $ (obtained for a known grade of carbon steel in comparison with stainless steel) with the value of $ K_{e} $ for the same such steels obtained under the operating conditions of the hydraulic machine.
Relation of relative resistance of metals to cavitation intensity
Timerbulatov, M. G. (author)
1976
Article (Journal)
English
BKL:
56.30
Wasserbau
Local classification TIB:
770/6550/8000
Relation of relative resistance of metals to cavitation intensity
Springer Verlag | 1976
|Cavitation effect on relative wear resistance of metal alloys
British Library Online Contents | 1994
|Interrelation between the cavitation resistance and microhardness of metals
British Library Online Contents | 2009
|Scaling of cavitation erosion progression with cavitation intensity and cavitation source
British Library Online Contents | 2012
|British Library Online Contents | 2003
|