A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
On the error of analytical continuation in physical geodesy
Abstract Analytical continuation of gravity anomalies and height anomalies is compared with Helmert's second condensation method. Assuming that the density of the terrain is constant and known the latter method can be regarded as correct. All solutions are limited to the second power of H/R, where H is the orthometric height of the terrain and R is mean sea-level radius. We conclude that the prediction of free-air anomalies and height anomalies by analytical continuation with Poisson's formula and Stokes's formula goes without error. Applying the same technique for geoid determination yields an error of the order of $ H^{2} $, stemming from the failure of analytical continuation inside the masses of the Earth.
On the error of analytical continuation in physical geodesy
Abstract Analytical continuation of gravity anomalies and height anomalies is compared with Helmert's second condensation method. Assuming that the density of the terrain is constant and known the latter method can be regarded as correct. All solutions are limited to the second power of H/R, where H is the orthometric height of the terrain and R is mean sea-level radius. We conclude that the prediction of free-air anomalies and height anomalies by analytical continuation with Poisson's formula and Stokes's formula goes without error. Applying the same technique for geoid determination yields an error of the order of $ H^{2} $, stemming from the failure of analytical continuation inside the masses of the Earth.
On the error of analytical continuation in physical geodesy
Sjöberg, Lars E. (author)
Journal of Geodesy ; 70
1996
Article (Journal)
English
BKL:
38.73
Geodäsie
The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy
Online Contents | 2006
|The topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy
Online Contents | 2006
|Online Contents | 1972
|UB Braunschweig | 1967
|