A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
FFT swept filtering: a bias-free method for processing fringe signals in absolute gravimeters
Abstract Absolute gravimeters, based on laser interferometry, are widely used for many applications in geoscience and metrology. Although currently the most accurate FG5 and FG5X gravimeters declare standard uncertainties at the level of $$2{-}3\,{\mu }\hbox {Gal}$$, their inherent systematic errors affect the gravity reference determined by international key comparisons based predominately on the use of FG5-type instruments. The measurement results for FG5-215 and FG5X-251 clearly showed that the measured g-values depend on the size of the fringe signal and that this effect might be approximated by a linear regression with a slope of up to $$0.030\,{\mu }\hbox {Gal/mV}$$. However, these empirical results do not enable one to identify the source of the effect or to determine a reasonable reference fringe level for correcting g-values in an absolute sense. Therefore, both gravimeters were equipped with new measuring systems (according to Křen et al. in Metrologia 53:27–40, 2016. 10.1088/0026-1394/53/1/27 applied for FG5), running in parallel with the original systems. The new systems use an analogue-to-digital converter HS5 to digitize the fringe signal and a new method of fringe signal analysis based on FFT swept bandpass filtering. We demonstrate that the source of the fringe size effect is connected to a distortion of the fringe signal due to the electronic components used in the FG5(X) gravimeters. To obtain a bias-free g-value, the FFT swept method should be applied for the determination of zero-crossings. A comparison of g-values obtained from the new and the original systems clearly shows that the original system might be biased by approximately $$3{-}5\,{\mu }\hbox {Gal}$$ due to improperly distorted fringe signal processing.
FFT swept filtering: a bias-free method for processing fringe signals in absolute gravimeters
Abstract Absolute gravimeters, based on laser interferometry, are widely used for many applications in geoscience and metrology. Although currently the most accurate FG5 and FG5X gravimeters declare standard uncertainties at the level of $$2{-}3\,{\mu }\hbox {Gal}$$, their inherent systematic errors affect the gravity reference determined by international key comparisons based predominately on the use of FG5-type instruments. The measurement results for FG5-215 and FG5X-251 clearly showed that the measured g-values depend on the size of the fringe signal and that this effect might be approximated by a linear regression with a slope of up to $$0.030\,{\mu }\hbox {Gal/mV}$$. However, these empirical results do not enable one to identify the source of the effect or to determine a reasonable reference fringe level for correcting g-values in an absolute sense. Therefore, both gravimeters were equipped with new measuring systems (according to Křen et al. in Metrologia 53:27–40, 2016. 10.1088/0026-1394/53/1/27 applied for FG5), running in parallel with the original systems. The new systems use an analogue-to-digital converter HS5 to digitize the fringe signal and a new method of fringe signal analysis based on FFT swept bandpass filtering. We demonstrate that the source of the fringe size effect is connected to a distortion of the fringe signal due to the electronic components used in the FG5(X) gravimeters. To obtain a bias-free g-value, the FFT swept method should be applied for the determination of zero-crossings. A comparison of g-values obtained from the new and the original systems clearly shows that the original system might be biased by approximately $$3{-}5\,{\mu }\hbox {Gal}$$ due to improperly distorted fringe signal processing.
FFT swept filtering: a bias-free method for processing fringe signals in absolute gravimeters
Křen, Petr (author) / Pálinkáš, Vojtech (author) / Mašika, Pavel (author) / Val’ko, Miloš (author)
Journal of Geodesy ; 93
2018
Article (Journal)
English
BKL:
38.73
Geodäsie
FFT swept filtering: a bias-free method for processing fringe signals in absolute gravimeters
Online Contents | 2018
|The results of 10th International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters (ICAG-2017)
Online Contents | 2021
|Results of the first North American comparison of absolute gravimeters, NACAG-2010
Online Contents | 2012
|Results of the first North American comparison of absolute gravimeters, NACAG-2010
Online Contents | 2012
|