A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A Regionally-Applicable model of union growth: Comment
Abstract This paper criticizes the approach used by M. Snowbarger in “A Regionally-Applicable Model for the Study of the Growth of Organized Labor,” The Annals of Regional Science, February, 1974. It is argued that the division of union membership change into “product-market” and “factor-market” effects has serious conceptual flaws, as well as using a special case of decomposition of change in a weighted aggregate, so that unambiguous partitioning of total change is impossible.
A Regionally-Applicable model of union growth: Comment
Abstract This paper criticizes the approach used by M. Snowbarger in “A Regionally-Applicable Model for the Study of the Growth of Organized Labor,” The Annals of Regional Science, February, 1974. It is argued that the division of union membership change into “product-market” and “factor-market” effects has serious conceptual flaws, as well as using a special case of decomposition of change in a weighted aggregate, so that unambiguous partitioning of total change is impossible.
A Regionally-Applicable model of union growth: Comment
Baldwin, Stephen E. (author)
1974
Article (Journal)
English
A regionally-applicable model of union growth: Reply
Online Contents | 1974
|A regionally-applicable model for the study of the growth of organized labor
Online Contents | 1974
|Residential Market Transformation: A Regionally Reasonable Approach?
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
|Developing regionally specific environmental building tools for China
British Library Online Contents | 2006
|