A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Growth effects of fiscal decentralization with weak economic motivation: the case of South Korea
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5330-3599
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-3407
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-4815
Abstract In this study, we apply an extended Granger causality test to examine whether fiscal decentralization in South Korea creates pro-growth effects. Our results show that the pro-growth effects in South Korea are significant at the provincial level, only from a revenue perspective. This result may suggest that strengthening local taxation power (revenue-centered decentralization) can better serve a local economic development goal than simply loosening use restrictions on inter-governmental transfers (expenditure-biased decentralization). At the city and county levels, however, no such pro-growth effects exist; we instead find partial evidence in support of the reverse causality–economic growth precedes revenue decentralization. This conflicting result seems to be associated with scale economies in public goods provision and the gap in administrative capacity between province- and lower-level local governments.
Growth effects of fiscal decentralization with weak economic motivation: the case of South Korea
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5330-3599
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-3407
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-4815
Abstract In this study, we apply an extended Granger causality test to examine whether fiscal decentralization in South Korea creates pro-growth effects. Our results show that the pro-growth effects in South Korea are significant at the provincial level, only from a revenue perspective. This result may suggest that strengthening local taxation power (revenue-centered decentralization) can better serve a local economic development goal than simply loosening use restrictions on inter-governmental transfers (expenditure-biased decentralization). At the city and county levels, however, no such pro-growth effects exist; we instead find partial evidence in support of the reverse causality–economic growth precedes revenue decentralization. This conflicting result seems to be associated with scale economies in public goods provision and the gap in administrative capacity between province- and lower-level local governments.
Growth effects of fiscal decentralization with weak economic motivation: the case of South Korea
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5330-3599
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8074-3407
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4579-4815
Abstract In this study, we apply an extended Granger causality test to examine whether fiscal decentralization in South Korea creates pro-growth effects. Our results show that the pro-growth effects in South Korea are significant at the provincial level, only from a revenue perspective. This result may suggest that strengthening local taxation power (revenue-centered decentralization) can better serve a local economic development goal than simply loosening use restrictions on inter-governmental transfers (expenditure-biased decentralization). At the city and county levels, however, no such pro-growth effects exist; we instead find partial evidence in support of the reverse causality–economic growth precedes revenue decentralization. This conflicting result seems to be associated with scale economies in public goods provision and the gap in administrative capacity between province- and lower-level local governments.
Growth effects of fiscal decentralization with weak economic motivation: the case of South Korea
Park, Soonae (author) / Park, Min-Gean (author) / Nam, Kyung-Min (author)
2019
Article (Journal)
English
Growth effects of fiscal decentralization with weak economic motivation: the case of South Korea
| Online Contents | 2019
Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe
| Online Contents | 2009
Partial fiscal decentralization
| Online Contents | 2009
Partial fiscal decentralization
| Online Contents | 2009
Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development
| DOAJ | 2023