A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Uncertainties in estimating the roughness coefficient of rock fracture surfaces
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-5714
Abstract Joint roughness has a critical role in the deformation behavior of discontinuous rock masses. Several subjective (visual comparison) and quantitative (statistical and fractal) approaches have been proposed for estimating rock joint roughness coefficient (JRC). Using a large collection of 223 published joint profiles, this study investigates variability of the JRC estimates by these approaches. Among the profile parameters, maximum height (Rz), ultimate slope (λ), and fractal dimension (Dh–L, determined using the hypotenuse leg method) show a lower sensitivity to the sampling interval than the root mean square of the first deviation (Z2), profile elongation index (δ), fractal dimension (Dc, determined using the compass-walking method), and standard deviation of the angle i (σi). Accordingly, this study proposes two separate sets of equations for quantitatively estimating JRC. The performances of these equations are examined by performing direct shear tests on 23 rock joint samples. The subjective approach is found to underestimate JRC by less than two units because it ignores (1) the main trend of the compared profile and (2) the limited scope of the standard profiles. Following these results, the visual comparison chart is updated by explicitly adding a scale bar for the y-axes of the standard profiles. Several basic rules for visual comparisons are also proposed.
Uncertainties in estimating the roughness coefficient of rock fracture surfaces
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-5714
Abstract Joint roughness has a critical role in the deformation behavior of discontinuous rock masses. Several subjective (visual comparison) and quantitative (statistical and fractal) approaches have been proposed for estimating rock joint roughness coefficient (JRC). Using a large collection of 223 published joint profiles, this study investigates variability of the JRC estimates by these approaches. Among the profile parameters, maximum height (Rz), ultimate slope (λ), and fractal dimension (Dh–L, determined using the hypotenuse leg method) show a lower sensitivity to the sampling interval than the root mean square of the first deviation (Z2), profile elongation index (δ), fractal dimension (Dc, determined using the compass-walking method), and standard deviation of the angle i (σi). Accordingly, this study proposes two separate sets of equations for quantitatively estimating JRC. The performances of these equations are examined by performing direct shear tests on 23 rock joint samples. The subjective approach is found to underestimate JRC by less than two units because it ignores (1) the main trend of the compared profile and (2) the limited scope of the standard profiles. Following these results, the visual comparison chart is updated by explicitly adding a scale bar for the y-axes of the standard profiles. Several basic rules for visual comparisons are also proposed.
Uncertainties in estimating the roughness coefficient of rock fracture surfaces
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-5714
Abstract Joint roughness has a critical role in the deformation behavior of discontinuous rock masses. Several subjective (visual comparison) and quantitative (statistical and fractal) approaches have been proposed for estimating rock joint roughness coefficient (JRC). Using a large collection of 223 published joint profiles, this study investigates variability of the JRC estimates by these approaches. Among the profile parameters, maximum height (Rz), ultimate slope (λ), and fractal dimension (Dh–L, determined using the hypotenuse leg method) show a lower sensitivity to the sampling interval than the root mean square of the first deviation (Z2), profile elongation index (δ), fractal dimension (Dc, determined using the compass-walking method), and standard deviation of the angle i (σi). Accordingly, this study proposes two separate sets of equations for quantitatively estimating JRC. The performances of these equations are examined by performing direct shear tests on 23 rock joint samples. The subjective approach is found to underestimate JRC by less than two units because it ignores (1) the main trend of the compared profile and (2) the limited scope of the standard profiles. Following these results, the visual comparison chart is updated by explicitly adding a scale bar for the y-axes of the standard profiles. Several basic rules for visual comparisons are also proposed.
Uncertainties in estimating the roughness coefficient of rock fracture surfaces
Li, Yanrong (author) / Xu, Qiang (author) / Aydin, Adnan (author)
2016
Article (Journal)
English
Uncertainties in estimating the roughness coefficient of rock fracture surfaces
| Online Contents | 2016
Estimating the three-dimensional joint roughness coefficient value of rock fractures
| Online Contents | 2017
Estimating the three-dimensional joint roughness coefficient value of rock fractures
| Online Contents | 2017