A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Effects of reducing agent and approaching anodes on chromium removal in electrokinetic soil remediation
Abstract A soil remediation method combining in situ reduction of Cr(VI) with approaching anodes electrokinetic (AAs-EK) remediation is proposed. EK experiments were conducted to compare the effect of approaching anodes (AAs) and fixed electrodes (FEs) with and without sodium bisulfite ($ NaHSO_{3} $) as a reducing agent. When $ NaHSO_{3} $ was added to the soil before EK treatment, 90.3% of the Cr(VI) was reduced to Cr(III). EK experiments showed that the adverse effect of contrasting migration of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) species, which limits the practical application of this technique, was eliminated in the presence of the reducing agent. Furthermore, Tessier fractionation analysis indicated that the reducing agent changed the distribution of the chemical forms of Cr. The AAs-EK method was shown to acidize the soil as the anode moved toward the cathode and this acid front pushed the “focusing” region toward the cathode. After remediation, the pH of the soil was between 1.8 and 5.0 in AAs-EK experiments. The total Cr removal efficiency was 64.4% (except in the “focusing” region) when the reduction reaction was combined with AAs-EK method. We conclude that AAs-EK remediation in the presence of $ NaHSO_{3} $ is an appropriate method for Cr-contaminated soil.
Effects of reducing agent and approaching anodes on chromium removal in electrokinetic soil remediation
Abstract A soil remediation method combining in situ reduction of Cr(VI) with approaching anodes electrokinetic (AAs-EK) remediation is proposed. EK experiments were conducted to compare the effect of approaching anodes (AAs) and fixed electrodes (FEs) with and without sodium bisulfite ($ NaHSO_{3} $) as a reducing agent. When $ NaHSO_{3} $ was added to the soil before EK treatment, 90.3% of the Cr(VI) was reduced to Cr(III). EK experiments showed that the adverse effect of contrasting migration of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) species, which limits the practical application of this technique, was eliminated in the presence of the reducing agent. Furthermore, Tessier fractionation analysis indicated that the reducing agent changed the distribution of the chemical forms of Cr. The AAs-EK method was shown to acidize the soil as the anode moved toward the cathode and this acid front pushed the “focusing” region toward the cathode. After remediation, the pH of the soil was between 1.8 and 5.0 in AAs-EK experiments. The total Cr removal efficiency was 64.4% (except in the “focusing” region) when the reduction reaction was combined with AAs-EK method. We conclude that AAs-EK remediation in the presence of $ NaHSO_{3} $ is an appropriate method for Cr-contaminated soil.
Effects of reducing agent and approaching anodes on chromium removal in electrokinetic soil remediation
Wei, Xiaona (author) / Guo, Shuhai (author) / Wu, Bo (author) / Li, Fengmei (author) / Li, Gang (author)
2015
Article (Journal)
English
Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of chromium-contaminated soil using approaching anodes
Springer Verlag | 2012
|Comparison of electrokinetic soil remediation methods using one fixed anode and approaching anodes
Online Contents | 2007
|Remediation of Chromium Contaminated Soil Using Electrokinetic Techniques and Soil Washing
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
|