A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Mixing Bismarck and child pension systems: an optimum taxation approach
Abstract Pensions with a strong tax–benefit link (Bismarck pensions) minimise the labour–leisure distortion of the public pension system. By contrast, pensions with a strong link of benefits to the number of children (child pensions) minimise the fertility distortion. When both types of distortion are present, we obtain a Corlett–Hague result regarding the optimal mix of the two pension formulae: the Bismack pension should be given a positive weight if and only if children are more complementary to leisure than consumption. Alternative fertility instruments such as child benefits turn out to be perfect substitutes to a child pension.
Mixing Bismarck and child pension systems: an optimum taxation approach
Abstract Pensions with a strong tax–benefit link (Bismarck pensions) minimise the labour–leisure distortion of the public pension system. By contrast, pensions with a strong link of benefits to the number of children (child pensions) minimise the fertility distortion. When both types of distortion are present, we obtain a Corlett–Hague result regarding the optimal mix of the two pension formulae: the Bismack pension should be given a positive weight if and only if children are more complementary to leisure than consumption. Alternative fertility instruments such as child benefits turn out to be perfect substitutes to a child pension.
Mixing Bismarck and child pension systems: an optimum taxation approach
Fenge, Robert (author) / von Weizsäcker, Jakob (author)
2009
Article (Journal)
English
Mixing Bismarck and child pension systems: an optimum taxation approach
Online Contents | 2009
|Beveridge versus Bismarck public-pension systems in integrated markets
Online Contents | 2007
|Bismarck-Türme und Bismarck-Säulen : eine Bestandsaufnahme
TIBKAT | 1997
|Bismarck-Türme und Bismarck-Säulen : eine Bestandsaufnahme
UB Braunschweig | 1997
|Kladderadatsch / Bismarck-Album
DataCite