A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Reducing traffic externalities by multiple-cordon pricing
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2855-2670
Abstract The second-best congestion pricing schemes including common optimum, one cordon, and multiple cordons schemes are compared with the first-best optimum pricing scheme. A cross-subsidy effect exists in these second-best pricing models. However, the scheme with more cordons will diminish the cross-subsidy and approach an efficient and equitable outcome. The relative efficiency of a cordon pricing scheme for the case of Taipei metropolis is very high. One single cordon yields excellent performance of 93% relative efficiency. There might be some factors causing the good results: the uncongested traffic condition, the linear unit distance cost in traffic flow forming a nonlinear cost function, and the trip demands with continuous space and the same destination (the central business district) in the network.
Reducing traffic externalities by multiple-cordon pricing
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2855-2670
Abstract The second-best congestion pricing schemes including common optimum, one cordon, and multiple cordons schemes are compared with the first-best optimum pricing scheme. A cross-subsidy effect exists in these second-best pricing models. However, the scheme with more cordons will diminish the cross-subsidy and approach an efficient and equitable outcome. The relative efficiency of a cordon pricing scheme for the case of Taipei metropolis is very high. One single cordon yields excellent performance of 93% relative efficiency. There might be some factors causing the good results: the uncongested traffic condition, the linear unit distance cost in traffic flow forming a nonlinear cost function, and the trip demands with continuous space and the same destination (the central business district) in the network.
Reducing traffic externalities by multiple-cordon pricing
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2855-2670
Abstract The second-best congestion pricing schemes including common optimum, one cordon, and multiple cordons schemes are compared with the first-best optimum pricing scheme. A cross-subsidy effect exists in these second-best pricing models. However, the scheme with more cordons will diminish the cross-subsidy and approach an efficient and equitable outcome. The relative efficiency of a cordon pricing scheme for the case of Taipei metropolis is very high. One single cordon yields excellent performance of 93% relative efficiency. There might be some factors causing the good results: the uncongested traffic condition, the linear unit distance cost in traffic flow forming a nonlinear cost function, and the trip demands with continuous space and the same destination (the central business district) in the network.
Reducing traffic externalities by multiple-cordon pricing
Tsai, Jyh-Fa (author) / Lu, Shao-Yu (author)
Transportation ; 45
2016
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
BKL:
55.80$jVerkehrswesen$jTransportwesen: Allgemeines
/
55.80
Verkehrswesen, Transportwesen: Allgemeines
/
74.75$jVerkehrsplanung$jVerkehrspolitik
/
74.75
Verkehrsplanung, Verkehrspolitik
Reducing traffic externalities by multiple-cordon pricing
| Online Contents | 2016
Cordon-based congestion pricing in a continuum traffic equilibrium system
| Online Contents | 2005
Cordon screen: A cordon-based congestion pricing policy evaluation method for U.S. cities
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2023
Specification of Optimal Cordon Pricing Locations and Charges
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002