A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparison of mean gravity anomalies at elevation with corresponding ground anomalies
Abstract In support of requirements for the U.S. Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, gravity anomalies have been upward continued to several elevations in different areas of the United States. One area was $ 34^{0} $ to $ 40^{0} $ N in latitude and $ 96^{0} $ to $ 103^{0} $ W in longitude, generally called the Oklahoma area. The computations proceeded from 26, 032 point anomalies to the prediction of mean anomalies in 14, 704, 2.5′×2.5′ blocks and 9,284, 5′×5′ blocks. These anomalies were upward continued along 28 profiles at 5′ intervals for every 30′ in latitude and longitude. These anomalies at elevations were meaned in various patterns to form mean 30′×30″, $ 1^{0} $×$ 1^{0} $, $ 5^{0} $×$ 5^{0} $ blocks. Comparisons were then made to the corresponding ground values. The results of these comparisons lead to practical recommendations on the arrangement of flight profiles in airborne gravimetry.
Comparison of mean gravity anomalies at elevation with corresponding ground anomalies
Abstract In support of requirements for the U.S. Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, gravity anomalies have been upward continued to several elevations in different areas of the United States. One area was $ 34^{0} $ to $ 40^{0} $ N in latitude and $ 96^{0} $ to $ 103^{0} $ W in longitude, generally called the Oklahoma area. The computations proceeded from 26, 032 point anomalies to the prediction of mean anomalies in 14, 704, 2.5′×2.5′ blocks and 9,284, 5′×5′ blocks. These anomalies were upward continued along 28 profiles at 5′ intervals for every 30′ in latitude and longitude. These anomalies at elevations were meaned in various patterns to form mean 30′×30″, $ 1^{0} $×$ 1^{0} $, $ 5^{0} $×$ 5^{0} $ blocks. Comparisons were then made to the corresponding ground values. The results of these comparisons lead to practical recommendations on the arrangement of flight profiles in airborne gravimetry.
Comparison of mean gravity anomalies at elevation with corresponding ground anomalies
Rapp, R. H. (author)
1967
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Geodäsie , Geometrie , Geodynamik , Mathematik , Mineralogie
Comparison of frediction accuracies of 5°×5° mean gravity anomalies from two methods
Online Contents | 1972
|Can Mean Values of Helmert's Gravity Anomalies be Continued Downward Directly?
Online Contents | 2010
|Moho Depths versus Gravity Anomalies
Online Contents | 1999
|Accuracy of mean gravity anomalies obtained from point and profile measurements
Online Contents | 1966
|Gravity anomalies in Northwestern Canada
Online Contents | 1949
|