A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Fee versus royalty licensing in spatial Cournot competition
Abstract This article investigates the optimal licensing mechanism in a spatial model where competitors set quantities and one firm owns a cost-reducing innovation. We show that when the firms spatially discriminate, the innovator gets higher profits by licensing through royalties instead than through a fixed fee, whereas in the case of uniform delivered quantities, the innovator prefers licensing by royalties (fixed fee) if and only if it has not (has) a sufficiently strong locational disadvantage with respect to the potential licensee.
Fee versus royalty licensing in spatial Cournot competition
Abstract This article investigates the optimal licensing mechanism in a spatial model where competitors set quantities and one firm owns a cost-reducing innovation. We show that when the firms spatially discriminate, the innovator gets higher profits by licensing through royalties instead than through a fixed fee, whereas in the case of uniform delivered quantities, the innovator prefers licensing by royalties (fixed fee) if and only if it has not (has) a sufficiently strong locational disadvantage with respect to the potential licensee.
Fee versus royalty licensing in spatial Cournot competition
Colombo, Stefano (author)
2014
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
BKL:
83.64$jRegionalwirtschaft
/
74.12
Stadtgeographie, Siedlungsgeographie
/
38.00$jGeowissenschaften: Allgemeines
/
38.00
Geowissenschaften: Allgemeines
/
83.64
Regionalwirtschaft
/
74.12$jStadtgeographie$jSiedlungsgeographie
RVK:
ELIB39
/
ELIB18
/
ELIB45
Local classification FBW:
oek 4450
Fee versus royalty licensing in spatial Cournot competition
Online Contents | 2014
|Dispersion equilibria in spatial Cournot competition
Online Contents | 2014
|Dispersion equilibria in spatial Cournot competition
Online Contents | 2014
|Cournot competition in spatial markets: Some further results
Online Contents | 2003
|Cournot competition in spatial markets: Some further results
Online Contents | 2003
|