A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Estimating Abrasivity of Rock by Laboratory and In Situ Tests
Abstract The degree to which a rock abrades another rock is called its “abrasivity”. Laboratory tests of abrasivity can be broadly divided into four kinds: drilling, rubbing, turning-operation and tumbling tests. The present study was initiated 30 years ago with the objective of investigating and developing methods for measuring rock abrasivity, and making some contribution towards understanding the relationships between the above test methods. Within the range of tests conducted, the turning-operation test turned out to be superior to the drilling test, albeit slightly, in terms of practicality. We have also conducted in situ tests using rock drills for the last 20 years. The results of those tests have been investigated and compared with the results of laboratory tests. There is a large degree of scatter in the data on gauge loss in button bits, which has obscured any correlations with laboratory data. Some correlations were found between height loss in button bits and laboratory findings.
Estimating Abrasivity of Rock by Laboratory and In Situ Tests
Abstract The degree to which a rock abrades another rock is called its “abrasivity”. Laboratory tests of abrasivity can be broadly divided into four kinds: drilling, rubbing, turning-operation and tumbling tests. The present study was initiated 30 years ago with the objective of investigating and developing methods for measuring rock abrasivity, and making some contribution towards understanding the relationships between the above test methods. Within the range of tests conducted, the turning-operation test turned out to be superior to the drilling test, albeit slightly, in terms of practicality. We have also conducted in situ tests using rock drills for the last 20 years. The results of those tests have been investigated and compared with the results of laboratory tests. There is a large degree of scatter in the data on gauge loss in button bits, which has obscured any correlations with laboratory data. Some correlations were found between height loss in button bits and laboratory findings.
Estimating Abrasivity of Rock by Laboratory and In Situ Tests
Okubo, S. (author) / Fukui, K. (author) / Nishimatsu, Y. (author)
2010
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
BKL:
38.58
Geomechanik
/
56.20
Ingenieurgeologie, Bodenmechanik
/
38.58$jGeomechanik
/
56.20$jIngenieurgeologie$jBodenmechanik
RVK:
ELIB41
Estimating Abrasivity of Rock by Laboratory and In Situ Tests
| British Library Online Contents | 2011
Estimating Abrasivity of Rock by Laboratory and In Situ Tests
| Online Contents | 2010
Wear of rock cutting tools, laboratory experiments on the abrasivity of rock
| Tema Archive | 1995
ISRM Suggested Method for Determining the Abrasivity of Rock by the CERCHAR Abrasivity Test
| Online Contents | 2013