A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Effect of Pressure and Stress Cycles on Fluid Flow in Hydraulically Fractured, Low-Porosity, Anisotropic Sandstone
Abstract Hydraulic fracture in deep rock masses is used across a variety of disciplines, from unconventional oil and gas to geothermal exploration. The overall efficiency of this process requires not only knowledge of the fracture mechanics of the rocks, but also how the newly generated fractures influence macro-scale pore connectivity. We here use cylindrical samples of Crab Orchard sandstone (90 mm length and 36 mm diameter), drilled with a central conduit of 9.6 mm diameter, to simulate hydraulic fracture. Results show that the anisotropy (mm-scale crossbedding orientation) affects breakdown pressure, and subsequent fluid flow. In experiments with samples cored parallel to bedding, breakdown pressures of 11.3 MPa, 27.7 MPa and 40.5 MPa are recorded at initial confining pressures at injection of 5 MPa, 11 MPa and 16 MPa, respectively. For samples cored perpendicular to bedding, breakdown pressure of 15.4 MPa, 27.4 MPa and 34.2 MPa were recorded at initial confining pressure at injection of 5 MPa, 11 MPa and 16 MPa, respectively. An increase in confining pressure after the initial fracture event often results in a significant decrease in flow rate through the newly generated fracture. We note that fluid flow recovers during a confining pressure “re-set” and that the ability of flow to recover is strongly dependent on sample anisotropy and initial confining pressure at injection.
Highlights A new laboratory method designed to measure in situ fluid flow rate through a tensile fracture in a tight anisotropic sandstone at variable confining pressures was reported.Results show an irreversible effect of cycling effective pressure on fluid flow in samples with fracture networks.Tomography data show that variations in fluid flow depends on both fracture thickness and anisotropy.
Effect of Pressure and Stress Cycles on Fluid Flow in Hydraulically Fractured, Low-Porosity, Anisotropic Sandstone
Abstract Hydraulic fracture in deep rock masses is used across a variety of disciplines, from unconventional oil and gas to geothermal exploration. The overall efficiency of this process requires not only knowledge of the fracture mechanics of the rocks, but also how the newly generated fractures influence macro-scale pore connectivity. We here use cylindrical samples of Crab Orchard sandstone (90 mm length and 36 mm diameter), drilled with a central conduit of 9.6 mm diameter, to simulate hydraulic fracture. Results show that the anisotropy (mm-scale crossbedding orientation) affects breakdown pressure, and subsequent fluid flow. In experiments with samples cored parallel to bedding, breakdown pressures of 11.3 MPa, 27.7 MPa and 40.5 MPa are recorded at initial confining pressures at injection of 5 MPa, 11 MPa and 16 MPa, respectively. For samples cored perpendicular to bedding, breakdown pressure of 15.4 MPa, 27.4 MPa and 34.2 MPa were recorded at initial confining pressure at injection of 5 MPa, 11 MPa and 16 MPa, respectively. An increase in confining pressure after the initial fracture event often results in a significant decrease in flow rate through the newly generated fracture. We note that fluid flow recovers during a confining pressure “re-set” and that the ability of flow to recover is strongly dependent on sample anisotropy and initial confining pressure at injection.
Highlights A new laboratory method designed to measure in situ fluid flow rate through a tensile fracture in a tight anisotropic sandstone at variable confining pressures was reported.Results show an irreversible effect of cycling effective pressure on fluid flow in samples with fracture networks.Tomography data show that variations in fluid flow depends on both fracture thickness and anisotropy.
Effect of Pressure and Stress Cycles on Fluid Flow in Hydraulically Fractured, Low-Porosity, Anisotropic Sandstone
Ibemesi, Peter (author) / Benson, Philip (author)
2022
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
BKL:
38.58
Geomechanik
/
56.20
Ingenieurgeologie, Bodenmechanik
/
38.58$jGeomechanik
/
56.20$jIngenieurgeologie$jBodenmechanik
RVK:
ELIB41
Study on the Evolution Law of Sandstone Porosity under Soaking-Drying Cycles
| Springer Verlag | 2022
PRESSURE BUILD-UP TEST ANALYSES OF A HYDRAULICALLY FRACTURED WELL WITH REDUCED HALF-LENGTH
| DOAJ | 2024
Stress Path Testing of an Anisotropic Sandstone
| British Library Online Contents | 2007
Stress Path Testing of an Anisotropic Sandstone
| Online Contents | 2007