A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Evaluation of Rocking and Toe Crushing Failure of Unreinforced Masonry Walls
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the variables that affect the shear behavior of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls and to propose the equation of the rocking and toe crushing strength of URM walls by regression analysis using the test data including the previous research. The main variables are the axial stress, the aspect ratio and the thickness of URM walls. The test results show that the specimens are governed by rocking and toe crushing failure modes. The relationship of the shear strength is proportionate to the square root of the vertical axial stress, and the relationship of the shear stress and aspect ratio is linearly proportional. Shear strength and cross sectional area are not proportional. For the URM walls tested, the proposed rocking and toe crushing strength/actual strength ratio of 0.95, and coefficient of correlation R of 0.9889 are more appropriate than the FEMA 306 rocking and toe crushing strength formulas.
Evaluation of Rocking and Toe Crushing Failure of Unreinforced Masonry Walls
The objectives of this study are to evaluate the variables that affect the shear behavior of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls and to propose the equation of the rocking and toe crushing strength of URM walls by regression analysis using the test data including the previous research. The main variables are the axial stress, the aspect ratio and the thickness of URM walls. The test results show that the specimens are governed by rocking and toe crushing failure modes. The relationship of the shear strength is proportionate to the square root of the vertical axial stress, and the relationship of the shear stress and aspect ratio is linearly proportional. Shear strength and cross sectional area are not proportional. For the URM walls tested, the proposed rocking and toe crushing strength/actual strength ratio of 0.95, and coefficient of correlation R of 0.9889 are more appropriate than the FEMA 306 rocking and toe crushing strength formulas.
Evaluation of Rocking and Toe Crushing Failure of Unreinforced Masonry Walls
Lee, Jung-Han (author) / Li, Chenghao (author) / Oh, Sang-Hoon (author) / Yang, Won-Jik (author) / Yi, Waon-Ho (author)
Advances in Structural Engineering ; 11 ; 475-489
2008-10-01
15 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Evaluation of Rocking and Toe Crushing Failure of Unreinforced Masonry Walls
| Online Contents | 2008
Modeling Unreinforced Brick Masonry Walls
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
SEISMIC REHABILITATION OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY WALLS
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999