A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Construct Reliability of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Exploratory Factor Analysis for a Distracted Driving Behavior Survey
Abstract This paper presents an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of a road safety behavior survey instrument prior to be used for collecting a Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) data. Through a self-administered survey, the data obtained from 100 respondents were analyzed using EFA to measure the survey instrument reliability. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items with responses recorded on a 10-point Likert scale. The results indicated that Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values obtained for the three constructs measured, Road Violations, Cognitive Errors and Action Errors were 0.767, 0.865 and 0.872 respectively. For Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity, the results were found to be statistically significant. In addition, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.922 (road violations), 0.959 (cognitive error) and 0.958 (action errors) which strongly suggest that all three constructs were within the required range of internal consistency. The results indicate that the questionnaire is valid and reliable tool for measuring driving errors due to distracted driving behavior.
Construct Reliability of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Exploratory Factor Analysis for a Distracted Driving Behavior Survey
Abstract This paper presents an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of a road safety behavior survey instrument prior to be used for collecting a Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) data. Through a self-administered survey, the data obtained from 100 respondents were analyzed using EFA to measure the survey instrument reliability. The questionnaire consisted of 14 items with responses recorded on a 10-point Likert scale. The results indicated that Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values obtained for the three constructs measured, Road Violations, Cognitive Errors and Action Errors were 0.767, 0.865 and 0.872 respectively. For Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity, the results were found to be statistically significant. In addition, the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.922 (road violations), 0.959 (cognitive error) and 0.958 (action errors) which strongly suggest that all three constructs were within the required range of internal consistency. The results indicate that the questionnaire is valid and reliable tool for measuring driving errors due to distracted driving behavior.
Construct Reliability of Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Exploratory Factor Analysis for a Distracted Driving Behavior Survey
Kabit, M. R. (author) / Lee, M. M. S. (author) / Zulkiply, N. (author)
2019-11-29
13 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
Distracted Driving Performance Measures: Spectral Power Analysis
| British Library Online Contents | 2015
Editor's Note - Distracted and Driving Don't Mix
Online Contents | 2012
Distracted Motor Vehicle Driving at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings
| British Library Online Contents | 2015
| British Library Online Contents | 2016