A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparison Between Model Prediction and Measured Response of a Prestressed Concrete Bridge Tested to Failure
The number of bridges that are approaching or exceeding their initial design life has increased radically. Meanwhile, an ever-increasing volume of traffic each year, both in number and weight of vehicles, is creating an additional critical situation for this kind of structure. To predict the response of bridges to traffic loads and their ultimate capacity with low uncertainties, we can use numerical structural models; however, such uncertainties increase as bridges age due to deterioration mechanisms. Non-destructive tests of material specimens and full-scale on-site load tests of the structure allow to update model parameters and have a better estimate of the bridge behaviour. However, different load tests provide different information with different impacts on the updated model accuracy. With the aid of a real-life case study, the Alveo Vecchio highway bridge, which has been tested to failure with a sequence of progressively increasing load, we aim to understand what behaviour can predict a structural model and what we can learn from a load test. This study is part of a research agreement between the Italian Ministry of Sustainable Infrastructure and Mobility, Autostrade per l’Italia SpA (the main operator of Italian highways), and the University of Trento. It concerns the management and monitoring of civil infrastructure intending to develop survey protocols and monitor systems to assess the safety and performance of existing highway bridges.
Comparison Between Model Prediction and Measured Response of a Prestressed Concrete Bridge Tested to Failure
The number of bridges that are approaching or exceeding their initial design life has increased radically. Meanwhile, an ever-increasing volume of traffic each year, both in number and weight of vehicles, is creating an additional critical situation for this kind of structure. To predict the response of bridges to traffic loads and their ultimate capacity with low uncertainties, we can use numerical structural models; however, such uncertainties increase as bridges age due to deterioration mechanisms. Non-destructive tests of material specimens and full-scale on-site load tests of the structure allow to update model parameters and have a better estimate of the bridge behaviour. However, different load tests provide different information with different impacts on the updated model accuracy. With the aid of a real-life case study, the Alveo Vecchio highway bridge, which has been tested to failure with a sequence of progressively increasing load, we aim to understand what behaviour can predict a structural model and what we can learn from a load test. This study is part of a research agreement between the Italian Ministry of Sustainable Infrastructure and Mobility, Autostrade per l’Italia SpA (the main operator of Italian highways), and the University of Trento. It concerns the management and monitoring of civil infrastructure intending to develop survey protocols and monitor systems to assess the safety and performance of existing highway bridges.
Comparison Between Model Prediction and Measured Response of a Prestressed Concrete Bridge Tested to Failure
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
Rizzo, Piervincenzo (editor) / Milazzo, Alberto (editor) / Rossi, F. (author) / Brighenti, F. (author) / Verzobio, A. (author) / Tonelli, D. (author) / Zonta, D. (author) / Migliorino, P. (author)
European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring ; 2022 ; Palermo, Italy
2022-06-19
11 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
Prestressed Concrete Bridge Tested to Failure: The Alveo Vecchio Viaduct Case Study
| BASE | 2023
Modelling the Behaviour of a Prestressed Bridge Tested to Failure
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
Dynamic Characterization of a Real-Scale Prestressed Concrete Beam Tested Until Failure
| Springer Verlag | 2023
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1956