A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
In-Situ Strength Assessment of Concrete: Detailed Guidelines
Guidelines describe the general process of in-situ compressive strength assessment. This process is divided into three main steps, data collection (using nondestructive testing and destructive testing), model identification and strength assessment. Three estimation quality levels (EQL) are defined depending on the targeted accuracy of strength assessment, based on three parameters, mean value of strength and standard deviation of strength on a test region and local value of strength. All the necessary definitions (test location, test reading, test region, test result, …) are given and the different stages of data collection, i.e. planning, NDT methods, cores (dimensions, conservation, location, testing, etc) are described. The identification of the conversion model is detailed and a specific attention is paid to the assessment of test result precision (TRP). For the identification of the model parameters, two options are considered either the development of a specific model or the calibration of a prior model. A specific option is also proposed, namely the bi-objective approach. Finally, the quantification of the errors of model fitting and strength prediction is described. The global methodology is synthetized in a flowchart.
In-Situ Strength Assessment of Concrete: Detailed Guidelines
Guidelines describe the general process of in-situ compressive strength assessment. This process is divided into three main steps, data collection (using nondestructive testing and destructive testing), model identification and strength assessment. Three estimation quality levels (EQL) are defined depending on the targeted accuracy of strength assessment, based on three parameters, mean value of strength and standard deviation of strength on a test region and local value of strength. All the necessary definitions (test location, test reading, test region, test result, …) are given and the different stages of data collection, i.e. planning, NDT methods, cores (dimensions, conservation, location, testing, etc) are described. The identification of the conversion model is detailed and a specific attention is paid to the assessment of test result precision (TRP). For the identification of the model parameters, two options are considered either the development of a specific model or the calibration of a prior model. A specific option is also proposed, namely the bi-objective approach. Finally, the quantification of the errors of model fitting and strength prediction is described. The global methodology is synthetized in a flowchart.
In-Situ Strength Assessment of Concrete: Detailed Guidelines
RILEM State Art Reports
Breysse, Denys (editor) / Balayssac, Jean-Paul (editor) / Breysse, Denys (author) / Balayssac, Jean-Paul (author) / Alwash, Maitham (author) / Biondi, Samuele (author) / Chiauzzi, Leonardo (author) / Corbett, David (author) / Garnier, Vincent (author) / Gonçalves, Arlindo (author)
2021-04-28
54 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
Assessment of in situ characteristic concrete strength
Online Contents | 2013
|Assessment of in situ characteristic concrete strength
British Library Online Contents | 2013
|Bayesian Probabilistic Assessment of In-Situ Concrete Strength
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2010
|Reinforced concrete structure: Non destructive in situ strength assessment of concrete
Online Contents | 2015
|Assessment and interpretation of in-situ strength of concrete
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
|