A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Assessment of Arsenic Removal Units in Arsenic-Prone Rural Area in Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract To mitigate arsenic contamination in Uttar Pradesh, India, the state government installed 365 arsenic removal units (ARUs) in arsenic-prone areas of the Ballia District for last 10 years. Each unit was capable of serving approximately 200–300 households. The local communities were to assume responsibility for the day-to-day operation and maintenance of the filters. A field survey was conducted to determine the outcome of the state government project based on a sample of 200 ARUs, very few of which are still functioning. It is shown that the project failed because the siting of the ARUs was less than optimal, many families living in villages with ARUs were denied access to or chose not to use the filtered water for socioeconomic reasons, and the ARUs were not properly maintained. Factors that contributed to the demise of the filters were the unavailability of filtration media and spare parts in local markets and a lack of participation of families in the communities responsible for maintaining the ARUs. The overall results conclude for operation and maintenance a constant monitoring is essential to sustain all installed ARUs at different locations. Also there is a training need assessment for the beneficiary group who run the individual unit through people’s participatory approach with optimum management related to hazardous sludge.
Assessment of Arsenic Removal Units in Arsenic-Prone Rural Area in Uttar Pradesh, India
Abstract To mitigate arsenic contamination in Uttar Pradesh, India, the state government installed 365 arsenic removal units (ARUs) in arsenic-prone areas of the Ballia District for last 10 years. Each unit was capable of serving approximately 200–300 households. The local communities were to assume responsibility for the day-to-day operation and maintenance of the filters. A field survey was conducted to determine the outcome of the state government project based on a sample of 200 ARUs, very few of which are still functioning. It is shown that the project failed because the siting of the ARUs was less than optimal, many families living in villages with ARUs were denied access to or chose not to use the filtered water for socioeconomic reasons, and the ARUs were not properly maintained. Factors that contributed to the demise of the filters were the unavailability of filtration media and spare parts in local markets and a lack of participation of families in the communities responsible for maintaining the ARUs. The overall results conclude for operation and maintenance a constant monitoring is essential to sustain all installed ARUs at different locations. Also there is a training need assessment for the beneficiary group who run the individual unit through people’s participatory approach with optimum management related to hazardous sludge.
Assessment of Arsenic Removal Units in Arsenic-Prone Rural Area in Uttar Pradesh, India
Kumar, Abhishek (author) / Roy, Malabika Biswas (author) / Roy, Pankaj Kumar (author) / Wallace, John Mike (author)
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A ; 100 ; 253-259
2019-01-24
7 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Rural Connectivity-An Overview of Uttar Pradesh
British Library Online Contents | 2006
|Concrete roads in Uttar Pradesh
Engineering Index Backfile | 1968
|Primary School in a Village of Uttar Pradesh, India
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2005
|Discontinuity-Induced Partial Instability in Markundi Hills, Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh, India
Springer Verlag | 2024
|