A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Passive Superconductor a Viable Method of Controlling Magnetization Multipoles in the SSC Dipole
Abstract At injection, the magnetization of the superconductor produces the dominant field error in the SSC dipole magnets. The field generated by magnetization currents in the superconductor is rich in higher symmetric multipoles (normal sextupole, normal decapole, and so on). Pieces of passive superconductor properly located within the bore of the dipole magnet can cancel the higher multipoles generated by the SSC dipole coils. The multipoles generated by the passive superconductor (predominantly sextupole and decapole) are controlled by the angular and radial location of the superconductor, the volume of superconductor, and the size of the superconducting filaments within the passive conductor. This paper will present the tolerances on each of these factors. The paper will show that multipole correction using passive superconductor is in general immune to the effects of temperature and magnetization decay due to flux creep, provided that dipole superconductor and the passive correction superconductor are properly specified. When combined with a lumped correction system, the passive superconductor can be a viable alternative to continuous correction coils within the SSC dipoles.
Passive Superconductor a Viable Method of Controlling Magnetization Multipoles in the SSC Dipole
Abstract At injection, the magnetization of the superconductor produces the dominant field error in the SSC dipole magnets. The field generated by magnetization currents in the superconductor is rich in higher symmetric multipoles (normal sextupole, normal decapole, and so on). Pieces of passive superconductor properly located within the bore of the dipole magnet can cancel the higher multipoles generated by the SSC dipole coils. The multipoles generated by the passive superconductor (predominantly sextupole and decapole) are controlled by the angular and radial location of the superconductor, the volume of superconductor, and the size of the superconducting filaments within the passive conductor. This paper will present the tolerances on each of these factors. The paper will show that multipole correction using passive superconductor is in general immune to the effects of temperature and magnetization decay due to flux creep, provided that dipole superconductor and the passive correction superconductor are properly specified. When combined with a lumped correction system, the passive superconductor can be a viable alternative to continuous correction coils within the SSC dipoles.
Passive Superconductor a Viable Method of Controlling Magnetization Multipoles in the SSC Dipole
Green, Michael A. (author)
Supercollider 1 ; 351-362
1989-01-01
12 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
Chapter 9 Electroglobules, Fulleroids and Multipoles
Trans Tech Publications | 2015
Passive Stack Ventilation: A Viable Alternative
British Library Online Contents | 1995
Passive Stack Ventilation: A Viable Alternative
British Library Online Contents | 1994
Representation of the gravitational potential by multipoles
| TIBKAT | 1983