A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparison of seismic behavior of chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames under near-fault ground motion
Chevron braced frame (inverted V shaped) is one of the common lateral load resisting systems in the steel structures. Although this system has high stiffness and resistance, it exhibits poor post-buckling behavior. Following the brace buckling on a story, an unbalanced vertical force enters to the mid-span of the beam which causing failure on that story and finally leading to the destruction of the structure. To avoid this condition, vertical elements known as “zipper columns” are used to transfer the unbalanced force to the upper stories and the hat truss is attached in the top story. This modified system called “suspended-zipper braced frame”. The present paper aims to compare the seismic behavior of the chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames under near fault earthquakes. For this purpose, nonlinear time history dynamic analyses were conducted on the chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames with 3, 6, 9 and 15 stories utilizing commercial general purpose nonlinear program. The selected models were designed in accordance with Iran’s steel provision and Iranian standard 2800. Based on the results, it is observed that the dynamic behavior of the suspended-zipper frames can be better than the chevron frames in drift controlling, maximum displacement of stories and response history of roof displacement under a specific earthquake.
Comparison of seismic behavior of chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames under near-fault ground motion
Chevron braced frame (inverted V shaped) is one of the common lateral load resisting systems in the steel structures. Although this system has high stiffness and resistance, it exhibits poor post-buckling behavior. Following the brace buckling on a story, an unbalanced vertical force enters to the mid-span of the beam which causing failure on that story and finally leading to the destruction of the structure. To avoid this condition, vertical elements known as “zipper columns” are used to transfer the unbalanced force to the upper stories and the hat truss is attached in the top story. This modified system called “suspended-zipper braced frame”. The present paper aims to compare the seismic behavior of the chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames under near fault earthquakes. For this purpose, nonlinear time history dynamic analyses were conducted on the chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames with 3, 6, 9 and 15 stories utilizing commercial general purpose nonlinear program. The selected models were designed in accordance with Iran’s steel provision and Iranian standard 2800. Based on the results, it is observed that the dynamic behavior of the suspended-zipper frames can be better than the chevron frames in drift controlling, maximum displacement of stories and response history of roof displacement under a specific earthquake.
Comparison of seismic behavior of chevron and suspended-zipper braced frames under near-fault ground motion
Asian J Civ Eng
Emami, Fereshteh (author) / Bakhtiari-Moghadam, Mohsen (author)
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering ; 22 ; 1131-1141
2021-09-01
11 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Comparison of chevron and suspended-zipper braced steel frames
Elsevier | 2015
|Comparison of chevron and suspended-zipper braced steel frames
Online Contents | 2016
|Comparison of chevron and suspended-zipper braced steel frames
Elsevier | 2016
|Comparison of chevron and suspended-zipper braced steel frames
British Library Online Contents | 2016
|