A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Machine learning metamodels for thermo-mechanical analysis of friction stir welding
This study explores the development and application of machine learning (ML) metamodels for the thermo-mechanical analysis of Friction Stir Welding (FSW). The main objective is to address the challenge of accurately predicting the thermo-mechanical behaviour of materials in FSW processes. Using finite element models, a high-fidelity dataset consisting of 20 Hammersley design datapoints is generated which is then used to develop a low-fidelity dataset of 420 datapoints using KNN (K-Nearest Neighbor) imputation. This low-fidelity dataset is used to train and test nine different ML metamodels (namely Linear Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), AdaBoost, Gaussian Process, Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree, Histogram-based Gradient Boosting and Extreme Gradient Boosting). The performance of these metamodels is evaluated based on various metrics like R2 (Coefficient of Determination), MAE (Mean Absolute Error) and MSE (Mean Squared Error). The findings reveal significant variance in the metamodels’ performance. Notably, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting, XGB (Extreme Gradient Boosting) and Random Forest metamodels are found to be the top four performers.
Machine learning metamodels for thermo-mechanical analysis of friction stir welding
This study explores the development and application of machine learning (ML) metamodels for the thermo-mechanical analysis of Friction Stir Welding (FSW). The main objective is to address the challenge of accurately predicting the thermo-mechanical behaviour of materials in FSW processes. Using finite element models, a high-fidelity dataset consisting of 20 Hammersley design datapoints is generated which is then used to develop a low-fidelity dataset of 420 datapoints using KNN (K-Nearest Neighbor) imputation. This low-fidelity dataset is used to train and test nine different ML metamodels (namely Linear Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), AdaBoost, Gaussian Process, Gradient Boosting, Decision Tree, Histogram-based Gradient Boosting and Extreme Gradient Boosting). The performance of these metamodels is evaluated based on various metrics like R2 (Coefficient of Determination), MAE (Mean Absolute Error) and MSE (Mean Squared Error). The findings reveal significant variance in the metamodels’ performance. Notably, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting, XGB (Extreme Gradient Boosting) and Random Forest metamodels are found to be the top four performers.
Machine learning metamodels for thermo-mechanical analysis of friction stir welding
Int J Interact Des Manuf
Burande, Dinesh V. (author) / Kalita, Kanak (author) / Gupta, Rohit (author) / Kumar, Ajay (author) / Chohan, Jasgurpreet Singh (author) / Kumar, Deepak (author)
2025-01-01
19 pages
Article (Journal)
Electronic Resource
English
Friction stir welding , Machine learning metamodels , Thermo-mechanical analysis , Finite element analysis , Predictive modelling , Manufacturing process Engineering , Engineering, general , Engineering Design , Mechanical Engineering , Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD, CAE) and Design , Electronics and Microelectronics, Instrumentation , Industrial Design
Machine learning metamodels for thermo-mechanical analysis of friction stir welding
Springer Verlag | 2025
|Thermo-mechanical modeling of friction stir welding
British Library Online Contents | 2010
|Challenges in Thermo-mechanical Analysis of Friction Stir Welding Processes
Online Contents | 2016
|A Thermo-Fluid Analysis of the Friction Stir Welding Process
British Library Online Contents | 2007
|Thermo-mechanical and microstructural issues in dissimilar friction stir welding of AA5086–AA6061
British Library Online Contents | 2011
|