A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Comparative Seismic Analysis of Residential SMRF Frame Structures: IS 1893-2023 (Draft) vs. IS 1893-2016 and ASCE 7-16
In order to evaluate a five-storey residential building’s seismic study using ETABS, this study compares the seismic requirements of the recently proposed seismic draft code IS1893 (parts 1&2):2023 to the previous Indian and American seismic standards IS1893:2016(part1) and ASCE7-16. The study’s conclusions showed that stronger base shear is produced by IS1893:2023(Draft) because of its higher coefficient of base shear. According to Indian standards, base shear in the direction of X and the direction of Y are roughly equal, but less according to American standards. As the storey count increases, the disparity in displacement between the draft code and the currently in use code also rises, It implies the deduction that the current code, IS1893:2016, delivers more displacement efficiency than the proposed code and American code without sacrificing strength and stiffness. It is concluded that IS 1893:2023(Draft) aligns more closely with ASCE 7-16 and provides improved seismic provisions when compared to the currently employed standard.
Comparative Seismic Analysis of Residential SMRF Frame Structures: IS 1893-2023 (Draft) vs. IS 1893-2016 and ASCE 7-16
In order to evaluate a five-storey residential building’s seismic study using ETABS, this study compares the seismic requirements of the recently proposed seismic draft code IS1893 (parts 1&2):2023 to the previous Indian and American seismic standards IS1893:2016(part1) and ASCE7-16. The study’s conclusions showed that stronger base shear is produced by IS1893:2023(Draft) because of its higher coefficient of base shear. According to Indian standards, base shear in the direction of X and the direction of Y are roughly equal, but less according to American standards. As the storey count increases, the disparity in displacement between the draft code and the currently in use code also rises, It implies the deduction that the current code, IS1893:2016, delivers more displacement efficiency than the proposed code and American code without sacrificing strength and stiffness. It is concluded that IS 1893:2023(Draft) aligns more closely with ASCE 7-16 and provides improved seismic provisions when compared to the currently employed standard.
Comparative Seismic Analysis of Residential SMRF Frame Structures: IS 1893-2023 (Draft) vs. IS 1893-2016 and ASCE 7-16
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
Agnihotri, Arvind Kumar (editor) / Reddy, Krishna R. (editor) / Bansal, Ajay (editor) / Alam, Shahnoor (author) / Sharma, Abhishek (author)
International Conference on Environmental Geotechnology, Recycled Waste Materials and Sustainable Engineering ; 2023 ; Jalandhar, India
2025-02-02
15 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
IBC Seismic Design of SMRF Structures
| Wiley | 2006
Practical Suggestions for Evaluating Existing Steel Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) Structures
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000