A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Topology and Size Optimization
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-0313
In this particular chapter, we will be focusing on a method called truss topology optimization. This method aims to optimize both the topology and size of trusses, which are structural elements commonly used in civil and mechanical engineering. We will be examining various types of planar and space trusses, including the 10-bar, 14-bar, 15-bar, 24-bar, 20-bar, 72-bar (3D), 39-bar, 45-bar truss, 25-bar (3D), and 39-bar (3D) trusses.
In order to optimize these trusses, we will be taking into consideration a variety of constraints along with multi-load conditions. First, we will be examining static constraints such as stress, displacement, and buckling. These are important factors to consider as trusses need to be able to withstand static loads without experiencing any damage or failure. Additionally, we will also be examining dynamic constraints such as natural frequency. These factors are important as trusses must also be able to withstand dynamic loads without experiencing resonance, which can cause significant damage.
Furthermore, we will also be considering practical manufacturing constraints such as element stresses, nodal displacements, Euler buckling criteria, and kinematic stability conditions. These are important factors to consider as they can have a significant impact on the feasibility and practicality of any optimized truss design. We will also be considering both continuous and discrete cross-sectional areas in our optimization process, as different trusses may require different types of cross-sectional areas.
In order to carry out the optimization process, we will be implementing ten different metaheuristic algorithms for each truss. These algorithms will allow us to explore a wide range of possible solutions and optimize the trusses to the best of our ability. Ultimately, we will be comparing the results of each algorithm to determine which is the most effective for each type of truss. By doing so, we hope to gain a better understanding of the truss topology optimization process and to provide insights into the most effective methods for optimizing trusses in the future.
Topology and Size Optimization
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-0313
In this particular chapter, we will be focusing on a method called truss topology optimization. This method aims to optimize both the topology and size of trusses, which are structural elements commonly used in civil and mechanical engineering. We will be examining various types of planar and space trusses, including the 10-bar, 14-bar, 15-bar, 24-bar, 20-bar, 72-bar (3D), 39-bar, 45-bar truss, 25-bar (3D), and 39-bar (3D) trusses.
In order to optimize these trusses, we will be taking into consideration a variety of constraints along with multi-load conditions. First, we will be examining static constraints such as stress, displacement, and buckling. These are important factors to consider as trusses need to be able to withstand static loads without experiencing any damage or failure. Additionally, we will also be examining dynamic constraints such as natural frequency. These factors are important as trusses must also be able to withstand dynamic loads without experiencing resonance, which can cause significant damage.
Furthermore, we will also be considering practical manufacturing constraints such as element stresses, nodal displacements, Euler buckling criteria, and kinematic stability conditions. These are important factors to consider as they can have a significant impact on the feasibility and practicality of any optimized truss design. We will also be considering both continuous and discrete cross-sectional areas in our optimization process, as different trusses may require different types of cross-sectional areas.
In order to carry out the optimization process, we will be implementing ten different metaheuristic algorithms for each truss. These algorithms will allow us to explore a wide range of possible solutions and optimize the trusses to the best of our ability. Ultimately, we will be comparing the results of each algorithm to determine which is the most effective for each type of truss. By doing so, we hope to gain a better understanding of the truss topology optimization process and to provide insights into the most effective methods for optimizing trusses in the future.
Topology and Size Optimization
https://orcid.org/https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-0313
In this particular chapter, we will be focusing on a method called truss topology optimization. This method aims to optimize both the topology and size of trusses, which are structural elements commonly used in civil and mechanical engineering. We will be examining various types of planar and space trusses, including the 10-bar, 14-bar, 15-bar, 24-bar, 20-bar, 72-bar (3D), 39-bar, 45-bar truss, 25-bar (3D), and 39-bar (3D) trusses.
In order to optimize these trusses, we will be taking into consideration a variety of constraints along with multi-load conditions. First, we will be examining static constraints such as stress, displacement, and buckling. These are important factors to consider as trusses need to be able to withstand static loads without experiencing any damage or failure. Additionally, we will also be examining dynamic constraints such as natural frequency. These factors are important as trusses must also be able to withstand dynamic loads without experiencing resonance, which can cause significant damage.
Furthermore, we will also be considering practical manufacturing constraints such as element stresses, nodal displacements, Euler buckling criteria, and kinematic stability conditions. These are important factors to consider as they can have a significant impact on the feasibility and practicality of any optimized truss design. We will also be considering both continuous and discrete cross-sectional areas in our optimization process, as different trusses may require different types of cross-sectional areas.
In order to carry out the optimization process, we will be implementing ten different metaheuristic algorithms for each truss. These algorithms will allow us to explore a wide range of possible solutions and optimize the trusses to the best of our ability. Ultimately, we will be comparing the results of each algorithm to determine which is the most effective for each type of truss. By doing so, we hope to gain a better understanding of the truss topology optimization process and to provide insights into the most effective methods for optimizing trusses in the future.
Topology and Size Optimization
Savsani, Vimal (author) / Tejani, Ghanshyam (author) / Patel, Vivek (author)
Truss Optimization ; Chapter: 5 ; 155-239
2024-02-17
85 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
Truss optimization , Structural optimization , Finite element method , Truss topology optimization , Discrete section , Continuous section , Natural frequency , Planar and space trusses Engineering , Mechanical Statics and Structures , Light Construction, Steel Construction, Timber Construction , Solid Construction , Structural Materials , Civil Engineering
Topology, Shape, and Size Optimization
| Springer Verlag | 2024
Multiobjective size and topology optimization of dome structures
| British Library Online Contents | 2012
Colliding bodies optimization for size and topology optimization of truss structures
| British Library Online Contents | 2015