A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
A platform for research: civil engineering, architecture and urbanism
Priority of Sustainable Transport Policy Implementation in Expert Perspective
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2086-1284
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0607-4153
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1552-3993
Implementing sustainable transportation policies is a fundamental problem for all countries, especially in choosing which policies are priorities to be implemented. A method is needed to prioritize the implementation of the policy. This study will develop priorities for implementing sustainable transportation policies with an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and involve nineteen experts as respondents. The respondents consisted of two transportation experts from academia, eight people from the general public, three policymakers in the provincial police, three people from the Provincial Development Planning Agency, and two public transport operators. The results of the AHP analysis show that the K1 policy (the application of technology to improve vehicle fuel efficiency or the use of environmentally friendly fuels) is the most recommended policy by experts in addition to the K3 (improved mobility and land use management) and K2 (mode shift and travel behavior change) policies. The three most recommended policy alternatives to be implemented in support of sustainable transportation are A2 (providing incentives for purchasing eco-friendly vehicles for vehicle renewal), A1 (building an environmentally friendly vehicle industry), and A5 (promoting better transportation infrastructure).
Priority of Sustainable Transport Policy Implementation in Expert Perspective
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2086-1284
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0607-4153
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1552-3993
Implementing sustainable transportation policies is a fundamental problem for all countries, especially in choosing which policies are priorities to be implemented. A method is needed to prioritize the implementation of the policy. This study will develop priorities for implementing sustainable transportation policies with an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and involve nineteen experts as respondents. The respondents consisted of two transportation experts from academia, eight people from the general public, three policymakers in the provincial police, three people from the Provincial Development Planning Agency, and two public transport operators. The results of the AHP analysis show that the K1 policy (the application of technology to improve vehicle fuel efficiency or the use of environmentally friendly fuels) is the most recommended policy by experts in addition to the K3 (improved mobility and land use management) and K2 (mode shift and travel behavior change) policies. The three most recommended policy alternatives to be implemented in support of sustainable transportation are A2 (providing incentives for purchasing eco-friendly vehicles for vehicle renewal), A1 (building an environmentally friendly vehicle industry), and A5 (promoting better transportation infrastructure).
Priority of Sustainable Transport Policy Implementation in Expert Perspective
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2086-1284
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0607-4153
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1552-3993
Implementing sustainable transportation policies is a fundamental problem for all countries, especially in choosing which policies are priorities to be implemented. A method is needed to prioritize the implementation of the policy. This study will develop priorities for implementing sustainable transportation policies with an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and involve nineteen experts as respondents. The respondents consisted of two transportation experts from academia, eight people from the general public, three policymakers in the provincial police, three people from the Provincial Development Planning Agency, and two public transport operators. The results of the AHP analysis show that the K1 policy (the application of technology to improve vehicle fuel efficiency or the use of environmentally friendly fuels) is the most recommended policy by experts in addition to the K3 (improved mobility and land use management) and K2 (mode shift and travel behavior change) policies. The three most recommended policy alternatives to be implemented in support of sustainable transportation are A2 (providing incentives for purchasing eco-friendly vehicles for vehicle renewal), A1 (building an environmentally friendly vehicle industry), and A5 (promoting better transportation infrastructure).
Priority of Sustainable Transport Policy Implementation in Expert Perspective
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
Lie, Han Ay (editor) / Sutrisna, Monty (editor) / Prasetijo, Joewono (editor) / Hadikusumo, Bonaventura H.W. (editor) / Putranto, Leksmono Suryo (editor) / Kresnanto, Nindyo Cahyo (author) / Sinaga, Ricko Nasrianda (author) / Risdiyanto (author) / Putri, Wika Harisa (author)
2022-02-01
9 pages
Article/Chapter (Book)
Electronic Resource
English
Transport Demand Management Strategy Priority Assessment Based on Expert Judgment
| DOAJ | 2023
Driving environmental concerns into transport policy: priority areas for EU transport policy
| British Library Online Contents | 1998
Is sustainable transport policy sustainable?
| Online Contents | 2015
Transport policy and its implementation
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996